Scott Daniel J, Campbell David N, Clarke David R, Goldberg Steven P, Karlin Daniel R, Mitchell Max B
The Children's Hospital Heart Institute and University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1501-7; discussion 1507-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.070.
Congenital supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS) is an arteriopathy associated with Williams-Beuren syndrome and other elastin gene deletions. Our objectives were to review outcomes of congenital SVAS repair and to compare prosthetic patch repair techniques to all-autologous slide aortoplasty.
Congenital SVAS repairs from 1988 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Peak instantaneous gradients were estimated by Doppler interrogation. Variables were compared by either Student's t test or Fisher's exact test. Risk factors were analyzed by chi(2) test. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Of 25 primary SVAS repairs, there were 10 all-autologous slide aortoplasties and 15 prosthetic patch aortoplasties. The prosthetic patch group included the Doty technique (n = 9), patch-augmented slide aortoplasty (n = 3), modified Brom technique (n = 1), interposition graft (n = 1), and two-sinus patch with transverse arch augmentation (n = 1). There was 1 early and 1 late death. Cumulative survival for all patients was 96% at 5 and 10 years. Event-free survival did not differ between groups (p = 0.481). There were 2 late reoperations (both were prosthetic patch patients with bicuspid aortic valve: 1 with recurrent aortic valve stenosis and 1 with aortic insufficiency). Bicuspid aortic valve was the only risk factor for reoperation (p = 0.003). Three patients weighing less than 10 kg with diffuse disease underwent attempted slide aortoplasty: 2 required patch augmentation and 1 had a recurrent gradient in less than 1 year postoperatively.
Outcomes after SVAS repair were good by any technique. No advantage to all-autologous slide aortoplasty was apparent at current follow-up. Based on our experience, slide aortoplasty is not recommended for small patients with diffuse disease.
先天性瓣上主动脉狭窄(SVAS)是一种与威廉姆斯-贝伦综合征及其他弹性蛋白基因缺失相关的动脉病变。我们的目的是回顾先天性SVAS修复的结果,并比较人工补片修复技术与全自体滑动主动脉成形术。
对1988年至2008年的先天性SVAS修复进行回顾性分析。通过多普勒检查估计峰值瞬时梯度。变量采用Student t检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较。危险因素采用卡方检验分析。生存情况采用Kaplan-Meier法估计。
在25例原发性SVAS修复中,有10例采用全自体滑动主动脉成形术,15例采用人工补片主动脉成形术。人工补片组包括多蒂技术(n = 9)、补片增强滑动主动脉成形术(n = 3)、改良布罗姆技术(n = 1)、间置移植术(n = 1)以及双窦补片加横弓增强术(n = 1)。发生1例早期死亡和1例晚期死亡。所有患者5年和10年的累积生存率为96%。两组间无事件生存率无差异(p = 0.481)。有2例晚期再次手术(均为人工补片修复且合并二叶式主动脉瓣的患者:1例复发主动脉瓣狭窄,1例主动脉瓣关闭不全)。二叶式主动脉瓣是再次手术的唯一危险因素(p = 0.003)。3例体重小于10 kg且病变弥漫的患者尝试进行滑动主动脉成形术:2例需要补片增强,1例术后不到1年出现复发梯度。
任何技术修复SVAS后的结果都良好。在目前的随访中,全自体滑动主动脉成形术并无明显优势。根据我们的经验,不建议对病变弥漫的小患者采用滑动主动脉成形术。