Greene L R, Cole M B
Neuropsychiatric Studies Unit, VA Medical Center, West Haven, CT.
Int J Group Psychother. 1991 Oct;41(4):499-521. doi: 10.1080/00207284.1991.11490677.
Drawing upon concepts derived from ego psychological and object relations psychoanalytic theories of individual development and from a depth group psychology, the present empirical study, a naturalistic field investigation, explored hypothesized relationships between aspects of patients' psychological boundaries and structural features of inpatient therapy groups. More specifically, patients were assessed in terms of their level (i.e., psychotic vs. borderline organization) and form (i.e., anaclitic vs. introjective) of psychopathology. Their perceptions of themselves and of their therapy groups were measured following participation in two kinds of small group treatment designed to differ in terms of degree of internal structuring. Findings, generally supporting the hypotheses, showed the anaclitic borderline patients, in particular, to be most sensitive to structural variations and most adversely affected by an impersonal and highly structured treatment climate. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings were discussed.
本实证研究借鉴了自我心理学和个体发展的客体关系精神分析理论以及深度团体心理学中的概念,是一项自然主义实地调查,探讨了患者心理边界方面与住院治疗团体结构特征之间的假设关系。更具体地说,对患者的精神病理学水平(即精神病性组织与边缘性组织)和形式(即依恋型与内投型)进行了评估。在参与两种内部结构化程度不同的小组治疗后,测量了他们对自己和治疗团体的看法。研究结果总体上支持了这些假设,表明尤其依恋型边缘性患者对结构变化最为敏感,并且在非人性化和高度结构化的治疗环境中受到的负面影响最大。讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。