Jamois Candice, Riek Myriam, Schmitt Christophe
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG Basel, Switzerland.
Arch Drug Inf. 2009 Mar;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-5174.2009.00016.x.
This study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetic effects of coadministration of saquinavir/ritonavir with efavirenz at steady state. METHODS: Healthy volunteers in this open-label, two-arm, one-sequence, two-period crossover study (planned enrollment of 40 participants) were randomized to one of two treatment arms: those in Arm 1 were scheduled to receive saquinavir/ritonavir 1,000/100 mg orally twice daily for 29 days and efavirenz 600 mg orally once daily starting on day 15 and continuing through day 29; participants randomized to Arm 2 were to receive efavirenz once daily for 29 days and saquinavir/ritonavir 1,000/100 mg twice daily starting on day 15 through day 29. Assessments included vital signs, laboratory analyses, electrocardiography, and blood levels of total saquinavir, ritonavir, and efavirenz. Pharmacokinetic parameters included C(max) (maximum observed plasma concentration), t(max) (time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration), (apparent elimination half-life), and AUC(0-tau) (area-under-the-plasma-concentration-time curve over one dosing interval). RESULTS: Eight participants (four in each arm) were enrolled; only two (one from each treatment arm) reached day 15 of the study and received the concurrent initial doses of saquinavir/ritonavir and efavirenz. The study was terminated prematurely after these two participants experienced nonserious adverse events. The participant in Arm 1 experienced mild abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, sleep disorder, and headache and the participant in Arm 2 experienced moderate-intensity abdominal pain and mild vomiting with leukocytosis accompanied by elevated pancreatic and hepatic enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values of 2-fold and 3.5-fold the upper limit of normal, respectively). Both participants recovered completely following treatment discontinuation. Only limited pharmacokinetic data were generated on these two participants. CONCLUSIONS: The early termination of this study precluded drawing any definitive conclusions regarding the pharmacokinetics at steady state of coadministered saquinavir/ritonavir and efavirenz.
本研究旨在调查稳态下沙奎那韦/利托那韦与依非韦伦联合给药的药代动力学效应。方法:在这项开放标签、双臂、单序列、两期交叉研究(计划招募40名参与者)中,健康志愿者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一:第1组的参与者计划口服沙奎那韦/利托那韦1000/100毫克,每日两次,共29天,从第15天开始口服依非韦伦600毫克,每日一次,持续至第29天;随机分配到第2组的参与者接受依非韦伦每日一次,共29天,从第15天开始至第29天口服沙奎那韦/利托那韦1000/100毫克,每日两次。评估包括生命体征、实验室分析、心电图以及沙奎那韦、利托那韦和依非韦伦的血药浓度。药代动力学参数包括C(max)(观察到的最大血浆浓度)、t(max)(达到观察到的最大血浆浓度的时间)、(表观消除半衰期)和AUC(0 - tau)(一个给药间隔内血浆浓度-时间曲线下的面积)。结果:招募了8名参与者(每组4名);只有2名(每个治疗组各1名)进入研究的第15天,并接受了沙奎那韦/利托那韦和依非韦伦的初始联合剂量。在这两名参与者出现非严重不良事件后,研究提前终止。第1组的参与者出现轻度腹部不适、腹泻、睡眠障碍和头痛,第2组的参与者出现中度腹痛和轻度呕吐,伴有白细胞增多以及胰腺和肝脏酶升高(天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶值分别为正常上限的2倍和3.5倍)。两名参与者在停药后均完全康复。仅获得了这两名参与者有限的药代动力学数据。结论:本研究的提前终止使得无法就联合使用沙奎那韦/利托那韦和依非韦伦在稳态下的药代动力学得出任何明确结论。