Suppr超能文献

[慢性哮喘儿童和青少年诱导痰中哮喘症状及炎症细胞标志物的控制]

[Control of asthma symptoms and cellular markers of inflammation in induced sputum in children and adolescents with chronic asthma].

作者信息

Ciółkowski Janusz, Stasiowska Barbara, Mazurek Henryk

机构信息

Public Outpatients Clinic in Lesko, Poland.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2009 Mar;26(153):178-83.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

After the GINA 2006 publication, asthma therapy is based on control of symptoms. However there are suggestions of monitoring of airway inflammation. Aim of the study was to compare clinical criteria of asthma control with cellular markers of lower airway inflammation in induced sputum in a group of young asthmatics. To assess relationship between sputum eosinophilia, asthma severity and spirometry.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A group of 154 young patients with chronic asthma (8-21 years) underwent sputum induction by inhalation of 4,5% saline solution. Sputum induction was effective in 121 patients (78%), and in this group control of clinical symptoms was assessed according to GINA 2006 criteria.

RESULTS

Asthma was controlled in 82 subjects (67.8%) and uncontrolled in 39 (32.2%). Patients with controlled asthma had higher FEV1/FVC (79.8 +/- 7.1% vs 74.2 +/- 9.9%; p = 0.004) and MMEF (80.7 +/- 23.0% vs 65.3 +/- 21.8%; p < 0.001) than those with uncontrolled disease, but the average FEV1 (as percent predicted) did not differ between the two groups. Patients with controlled asthma had lower sputum eosinophil count than those with uncontrolled asthma (3.5 +/- 6.3% vs 7.2 +/- 8.7%; p = 0.01), but difference in neutrophil count was borderline (27.3 +/- 15.5% vs 34.5 +/- 21.0%; p = 0.05). High sputum eosinophil count (> 3%) was observed in 24.4% of patients with controlled asthma and in 61.5% with uncontrolled asthma (p < 0.001). Increased sputum neutrophil count was more frequent in a group of uncontrolled asthma (2.4 vs 15.4%; p = 0.022). Mean sputum eosinophil count was lower in patients with mild astma than in patients with moderate-severe disease (3.1 +/- 5.7% vs 7.1% +/- 8.8; p = 0.006). Patients with high sputum eosinophil count had lower FEV1 (89.4 +/- 14.9% vs 94.9 +/- 13.9%; p = 0.047), FEV1/FVC (74.5 +/- 10.1% vs 79.2 +/- 9.3%; p = 0.01) and MMEF (68.7 +/- 23.3% vs 81.7 +/- 23.1%; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of young asthmatics, control of asthma symptoms was observed in 67.8% of patients. However, cellular markers of lower airway inflammation were present in 1/4 of patients with controlled asthma and in 3/4 with uncontrolled disease. Sputum eosinophilia was related to asthma severity. FEV1/FVC and MMEF were more important that FEV1 for estimating control of asthma. Improvement of asthma control scoring is needed as well as availability of simple methods of inflammation monitoring.

摘要

未标注

2006年全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)发布后,哮喘治疗基于症状控制。然而,也有对气道炎症监测的建议。本研究的目的是比较一组年轻哮喘患者中哮喘控制的临床标准与诱导痰中气道炎症的细胞标志物。评估痰嗜酸性粒细胞增多、哮喘严重程度与肺量计之间的关系。

材料与方法

一组154例慢性哮喘年轻患者(8 - 21岁)通过吸入4.5%盐水溶液进行痰诱导。121例患者(78%)痰诱导成功,在该组中根据2006年GINA标准评估临床症状控制情况。

结果

82例患者(67.8%)哮喘得到控制,39例(32.2%)未得到控制。哮喘得到控制的患者的第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)(79.8±7.1%对74.2±9.9%;p = 0.004)和最大呼气中期流速(MMEF)(80.7±23.0%对65.3±21.8%;p < 0.001)高于未得到控制的患者,但两组间平均FEV1(预测值百分比)无差异。哮喘得到控制的患者痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数低于未得到控制的患者(3.5±6.3%对7.2±8.7%;p = 0.01),但中性粒细胞计数差异接近临界值(27.3±15.5%对34.5±21.0%;p = 0.05)。24.4%哮喘得到控制的患者和61.5%未得到控制的患者痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数高(>3%)(p < 0.001)。未得到控制的哮喘组痰中性粒细胞计数增加更常见(2.4%对15.4%;p = 0.022)。轻度哮喘患者的平均痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数低于中度 - 重度疾病患者(3.1±5.7%对7.1%±8.8;p = 0.006)。痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数高的患者FEV1较低(89.4±14.9%对94.9±13.9%;p = 0.047),FEV1/FVC较低(74.5±10.1%对79.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验