Plumley Joshua A, Evanseck Jeffrey D
Center for Computational Sciences and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15282-1530, USA.
J Phys Chem A. 2009 May 21;113(20):5985-92. doi: 10.1021/jp811202c.
Lewis acidity is customarily gauged by comparing the relative magnitude of coordinate covalent bonding energies, where the Lewis acid moiety is varied and the Lewis base is kept constant. However, the prediction of Lewis acidity from first principles is sometimes contrary to that suggested by experimental bond energies. Specifically, the order of boron trihalide Lewis acidities predicted from substituent electronegativity arguments is opposite to that inferred by experiment. Contemporary explanations for the divergence between theory, computation, and experiment have led to further consternation. Due to the fundamental importance of understanding the origin of Lewis acidity, we report periodic trends for 21 boron Lewis acids, as well as their coordinate covalent bond strengths with NH(3), utilizing ab initio, density functional theory, and natural bond orbital analysis. Coordinate covalent bond dissociation energy has been determined to be an inadequate index of Lewis acid strength. Instead, acidity is measured in the manner originally intended by Lewis, which is defined by the valence of the acid of interest. Boron Lewis acidity is found to depend upon substituent electronegativity and atomic size, differently than for known Brønsted-Lowry periodic trends. Across the second period, stronger substituent electronegativity correlates (R(2) = 0.94) with increased Lewis acidity. However, across the third period, an equal contribution from substituent electronegativity and atomic radii is correlated (R(2) = 0.98) with Lewis acidity. The data suggest that Lewis acidity depends upon electronegativity solely down group 14, while equal contribution from both substituent electronegativity and atomic size are significant down groups 16 and 17. Originally deduced from Pauling's electronegativities, boron's substituents determine acidity by influencing the population of its valence by withdrawing electron density. However, size effects manifest differently than previously considered, where greater sigma bond (not pi bond) orbital overlap between boron and larger substituents increase the electron density available to boron's valence, thereby decreasing Lewis acidity. The computed electronegativity and size effects of substituents establish unique periodic trends that provide a novel explanation of boron Lewis acidity, consistent with first principle predictions. The findings resolve ambiguities between theory, computation, and experiment and provide a clearer understanding of Lewis acidity.
路易斯酸度通常是通过比较配位共价键能的相对大小来衡量的,其中路易斯酸部分是变化的,而路易斯碱保持不变。然而,从第一性原理预测路易斯酸度有时与实验键能所表明的情况相反。具体而言,从取代基电负性论据预测的三卤化硼路易斯酸度顺序与实验推断的顺序相反。对理论、计算和实验之间差异的当代解释引发了进一步的困惑。由于理解路易斯酸度起源的根本重要性,我们利用从头算、密度泛函理论和自然键轨道分析,报告了21种硼路易斯酸的周期性趋势,以及它们与NH(3)的配位共价键强度。已确定配位共价键解离能不足以作为路易斯酸强度的指标。相反,酸度是按照路易斯最初设想的方式来衡量的,即由所关注酸的价态来定义。发现硼路易斯酸度取决于取代基电负性和原子大小,这与已知的布朗斯特-劳里周期性趋势不同。在第二周期中,更强的取代基电负性与增加的路易斯酸度相关(R(2) = 0.94)。然而,在第三周期中,取代基电负性和原子半径的同等贡献与路易斯酸度相关(R(2) = 0.98)。数据表明,路易斯酸度仅在第14族中取决于电负性,而在第16族和第17族中,取代基电负性和原子大小的同等贡献都很显著。硼的取代基最初是根据鲍林电负性推导出来的,它们通过吸引电子密度来影响硼的价电子占据情况,从而决定酸度。然而,尺寸效应的表现与之前认为的不同,硼与较大取代基之间更大的σ键(而非π键)轨道重叠增加了硼价电子可利用的电子密度,从而降低了路易斯酸度。计算得出的取代基电负性和尺寸效应建立了独特的周期性趋势,为硼路易斯酸度提供了一种新颖的解释,与第一性原理预测一致。这些发现解决了理论、计算和实验之间的模糊性,使人们对路易斯酸度有了更清晰的理解。