Sastre Inés
Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (CCHS), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Curr Anthropol. 2008 Dec;49(6):1021-36; discussion 1036-51. doi: 10.1086/529423.
This paper proposes a new view of conflict in European Iron Age societies: considering isolationism as an alternative to warfare. Study of the castros (fortified settlements) of the Iberian Northwest suggests the organization of production as a main explanatory element in the emergence of identities based on exclusion and the imposition of communal structures of power. The relationship between these communities must have been one of conflict, and the unequal productive success of domestic units and the requirement of external marriage interchanges created realms of interaction in which internal conflict surely arose. These tendencies were kept in check by controlling settlement growth. Although a conflict-prone situation is documented in the archaeological record, there is no evidence that warfare as an endemic reality created groups of warriors. Warfare-related activity in these Iron Age societies was neither heroic nor hierarchical. Warfare did not determine the form of society but rather was related to the productive and reproductive organization of the societies that engaged in it.
将孤立主义视为战争的一种替代选择。对伊比利亚西北部的城堡(设防定居点)的研究表明,生产组织是基于排斥形成身份认同以及强加公共权力结构出现的主要解释因素。这些社区之间的关系必定是冲突关系,家庭单位生产成果的不平等以及外部婚姻交换的需求创造了互动领域,内部冲突肯定在其中产生。通过控制定居点的发展来抑制这些趋势。尽管考古记录中记载了一种易于发生冲突的情况,但没有证据表明战争作为一种普遍存在的现实造就了武士群体。这些铁器时代社会中与战争相关的活动既不英勇也不具有等级性。战争并未决定社会形态,而是与参与战争的社会的生产和再生产组织相关。