Suppr超能文献

改进决策分析:儿科健康结果的家长偏好(效用值)。

Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes.

作者信息

Carroll Aaron E, Downs Stephen M

机构信息

Children's Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2009 Jul;155(1):21-5, 25.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.040. Epub 2009 Apr 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To gather and calculate utilities for a wide range of health states in the pediatric population.

STUDY DESIGN

The study subjects, parents or guardians at least 18 years of age with at least 1 child under age 18 years, were recruited through our Pediatric Research Network (PResNet). Recruitment locations included pediatric clinics, the Indiana State Fair, and public and private conventions. Each subject's utilities were assessed on 3 random health states out of 29 chosen for the study. Both the time trade-off and standard gamble methods were used to measure utilities.

RESULTS

Utilities were assessed in a total of 4016 participants (a recruitment rate of 88%). Utility values ranged from a high for acute otitis media (0.96 by standard gamble; 0.97 by time trade-off) to a low for severe mental retardation (0.59 by standard gamble; 0.51 by time trade-off).

CONCLUSIONS

Our extensive data set of utility assessments for a wide range of disease states can aid future economic evaluations of pediatric health care.

摘要

目的

收集并计算儿科人群中广泛健康状态的效用值。

研究设计

研究对象为至少18岁且育有至少一名18岁以下子女的父母或监护人,通过我们的儿科研究网络(PResNet)招募。招募地点包括儿科诊所、印第安纳州博览会以及公共和私人会议。每位受试者针对研究选定的29种健康状态中的3种随机健康状态评估其效用值。采用时间权衡法和标准博弈法来测量效用值。

结果

共对4016名参与者进行了效用值评估(招募率为88%)。效用值范围从急性中耳炎的高分(标准博弈法为0.96;时间权衡法为0.97)到重度智力障碍的低分(标准博弈法为0.59;时间权衡法为0.51)。

结论

我们针对广泛疾病状态的效用评估的大量数据集可为未来儿科医疗保健的经济评估提供帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验