Faucette L B, Scholl B, Beighley R E, Governo J
Filtrexx International, 551 East Lake Dr, Decatur, GA 30030, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2009 Apr 27;38(3):1248-54. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0415. Print 2009 May-Jun.
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II requires construction activities to have erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) designed and installed for site storm water management. Although BMPs are specified on storm water pollution prevention plans (SWPPPs) as part of the construction general permit (GP), there is little evidence in the research literature as to how BMPs perform or should be designed. The objectives of this study were to: (i) comparatively evaluate the performance of common construction activity erosion control BMPs under a standardized test method, (ii) evaluate the performance of compost erosion control blanket thickness, (iii) evaluate the performance of compost erosion control blankets (CECBs) on a variety of slope angles, and (iv) determine Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) cover management factors (C factors) for these BMPs to assist site designers and engineers. Twenty-three erosion control BMPs were evaluated using American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-6459, standard test method for determination of ECB performance in protecting hill slopes from rainfall induced erosion, on 4:1 (H:V), 3:1, and 2:1 slopes. Soil loss reduction for treatments exposed to 5 cm of rainfall on a 2:1 slope ranged from-7 to 99%. For rainfall exposure of 10 cm, treatment soil loss reduction ranged from 8 to 99%. The 2.5 and 5 cm CECBs significantly reduced erosion on slopes up to 2:1, while CECBs < 2.5 cm are not recommended on slopes >or= 4:1 when rainfall totals reach 5 cm. Based on the soil loss results, USLE C factors ranged from 0.01 to 0.9. These performance and design criteria should aid site planners and designers in decision-making processes.
国家污染物排放消除系统(NPDES)第二阶段要求建设活动制定并安装用于场地雨水管理的侵蚀和泥沙控制最佳管理措施(BMPs)。尽管BMPs在雨水污染预防计划(SWPPPs)中作为建设通用许可证(GP)的一部分被明确规定,但研究文献中几乎没有关于BMPs如何发挥作用或应如何设计的证据。本研究的目的是:(i)在标准化测试方法下比较评估常见建设活动侵蚀控制BMPs的性能;(ii)评估堆肥侵蚀控制毯厚度的性能;(iii)评估堆肥侵蚀控制毯(CECBs)在各种坡度角上的性能;(iv)确定这些BMPs的通用土壤流失方程(USLE)覆盖管理因子(C因子),以协助场地设计师和工程师。使用美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)D - 6459标准测试方法,在4:1(高:宽)、3:1和2:1的坡度上对23种侵蚀控制BMPs进行了评估,该方法用于测定ECB在保护山坡免受降雨引起的侵蚀方面的性能。在2:1的坡度上,降雨量为5厘米时,各处理的土壤流失减少率在 - 7%至99%之间。降雨量为10厘米时,处理的土壤流失减少率在8%至99%之间。2.5厘米和5厘米的CECBs在坡度达2:1时能显著减少侵蚀,而当降雨总量达到5厘米时,对于坡度≥4:1的情况,不建议使用厚度<2.5厘米的CECBs。根据土壤流失结果,USLE C因子范围为0.01至0.9。这些性能和设计标准应有助于场地规划者和设计师进行决策。