Denneberg Nanna Akerlund, Egenvall Agneta
Jönköping Small Animal Hospital Oskarshallsgatan 6, SE-553 03 Jönköping, Sweden.
Acta Vet Scand. 2009 Apr 29;51(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-19.
External radiation therapy (RT) has been available for small animals in Sweden since 2006. This study was designed to obtain information on owner experiences and perceptions related to RT of cancer in their dogs. Another survey was used to determine the attitudes about use of RT in a group of Swedish veterinarians. Their responses were analyzed and compared to their level of knowledge of oncology and RT.
Owners of all dogs (n = 23) who had undergone RT for malignancy at Jönköping Small Animal Hospital between March 2006 to September 2007 were interviewed. A questionnaire was given to a selected group of veterinarians.
All 23 owners responded. All owners thought that their dog did well during RT and most that their dog was also fine during the following phase when acute RT-related skin reactions occur and heal. Three owners stated that their dog had pain that negatively impacted quality of life because of radiation dermatitis. Five owners reported that RT positively impacted quality of life of the dog during the first weeks after RT because palliation was achieved. The owners were not disturbed by the efforts required of them. All but one owner (22 of 23) stated that they would make the same decision about RT again if a similar situation occurred. The most important factor for this decision was the chance to delay occurrence of tumour-related discomfort. The chance for cure was of less importance but still essential, followed by expected side effects. Time commitments, travel, number of treatments required and financial cost; all had low impact. The veterinarian survey showed that less background knowledge of small animal oncology/RT was associated with more negative expectations of RT for small animals.
The results show that for these owners, RT was a worthwhile treatment modality and that the discomfort for the dog was manageable and acceptable relative to the benefits. Improved continuing education about small animal RT in Sweden will likely result in increased evidence-based and positive treatment recommendations concerning RT by veterinarians.
自2006年起,瑞典便已具备针对小型动物的外照射放疗(RT)技术。本研究旨在获取犬主在其爱犬接受癌症放疗方面的经历及看法。另一项调查则用于确定一组瑞典兽医对放疗应用的态度。对他们的回答进行了分析,并与他们的肿瘤学和放疗知识水平进行了比较。
对2006年3月至2007年9月期间在延雪平小动物医院接受恶性肿瘤放疗的所有犬只(n = 23)的主人进行了访谈。向一组选定的兽医发放了问卷。
23位主人均作出回应。所有主人都认为他们的犬在放疗期间情况良好,且大多数主人认为在随后急性放疗相关皮肤反应出现并愈合的阶段,他们的犬也状况良好。三位主人表示,由于放射性皮炎,他们的犬出现了疼痛,对生活质量产生了负面影响。五位主人报告称,放疗在放疗后的头几周对犬的生活质量产生了积极影响,因为实现了姑息治疗。主人并未因所需付出的努力而感到困扰。除一位主人外(23位中有22位),所有主人均表示,如果类似情况再次发生,他们会再次做出关于放疗的相同决定。做出这一决定的最重要因素是有机会推迟肿瘤相关不适的出现。治愈的可能性虽重要性稍低但仍至关重要,其次是预期的副作用。时间投入、行程、所需治疗次数和经济成本;所有这些影响都较小。兽医调查显示,小动物肿瘤学/放疗背景知识较少与对小动物放疗的负面期望较高相关。
结果表明,对这些主人而言,放疗是一种值得采用的治疗方式,而且相对于益处而言,犬的不适是可控且可接受的。瑞典加强对小动物放疗的继续教育,可能会使兽医在放疗方面做出更多基于证据的积极治疗建议。