Mitra Priya, Coch Donna
Department of Education, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Jun;9(2):216-28. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.216.
Previous event-related potential (ERP) research on letter processing has suggested that a P150 reflects low-level, featural processing, whereas a P260 reflects high-level, abstract letter processing. In order to investigate the specificity of these effects, ERPs were recorded in a masked priming paradigm using matching and nonmatching pairs of letters (e.g., g-g, g-j) and false fonts (e.g.,[SYMBOL: SEE TEXT], [SYMBOL: SEE TEXT]). If the P150 priming effect indexes featural processing, there should be no effect of condition on the P150, since the letters and false fonts shared visual features. If the P260 priming effect indexes the processing of abstract letter representations, it should be evident only in the letter condition. As was expected, the P150 priming effect was similar for letters and false fonts; however, the P260 priming effect was also similar between conditions. Thus, the P260 priming effect may not be sensitive to abstract letter processing per se, or such processing may be extremely abstract.
先前有关字母加工的事件相关电位(ERP)研究表明,P150反映低水平的特征加工,而P260反映高水平的抽象字母加工。为了探究这些效应的特异性,在一个掩蔽启动范式中记录ERP,该范式使用匹配和不匹配的字母对(如g-g、g-j)以及伪字体(如[符号:见文本]、[符号:见文本])。如果P150启动效应指示特征加工,那么条件对P150应该没有影响,因为字母和伪字体具有共同的视觉特征。如果P260启动效应指示抽象字母表征的加工,那么它应该只在字母条件下才明显。正如预期的那样,字母和伪字体的P150启动效应相似;然而,不同条件之间的P260启动效应也相似。因此,P260启动效应可能本身对抽象字母加工不敏感,或者这种加工可能极其抽象。