Gilmour Gary, Pioli Elsa Y, Dix Sophie L, Smith Janice W, Conway Michael W, Jones Wendy T, Loomis Sally, Mason Rebecca, Shahabi Shahram, Tricklebank Mark D
Lilly Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey GU206PH, England, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Aug;205(2):203-16. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1530-7. Epub 2009 May 7.
Little attention has been paid to the relative equivalence of behavioural effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in rodents, with different compounds often used interchangeably to "model" aspects of schizophrenia in preclinical studies.
To further resolve such conjecture, the present study systematically compared eight different NMDA receptor antagonists: MK-801, PCP, ketamine, memantine, SDZ 220,581, Ro 25-6981, CP 101-606 and NVP-AAM077, in a series of variable interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement. Aspects of motivation as indexed in these tasks may well be impaired in schizophrenia and undoubtedly impact on the capacity to perform more complex, explicit tasks of cognition.
An initial locomotor activity assessment demonstrated that all antagonists tested, except the NR2A-subunit preferring antagonist NVP-AAM077, induced hyperactivity, albeit of greatly differing magnitudes, qualities and temporal profiles. Three distinct patterns of antagonist effect were evident from the VI assays used: a uniform decrease in responding produced by (S)-(+)-ketamine, memantine and NVP-AAM077, a uniform increase in responding caused by the NR2B-subunit preferring antagonists Ro 25-6981 and CP 101-606, and variable bidirectional effects of PCP, SDZ 220,581 and MK-801.
Despite nominally common mechanisms of action and often presumed biological equivalence, the NMDA antagonists tested produced very diverse effects on the expression of instrumental action. Other aspects of responding were left intact, including switching and matching behaviours, and the ability to respond to conditional stimuli. The implications of such findings with regard to animal modelling of schizophrenic psychotic symptoms are manifold.
在啮齿动物中,N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂行为效应的相对等效性很少受到关注,在临床前研究中,不同的化合物经常被交替使用来“模拟”精神分裂症的各个方面。
为了进一步解决这种推测,本研究系统地比较了八种不同的NMDA受体拮抗剂:MK-801、苯环己哌啶(PCP)、氯胺酮、美金刚、SDZ 220,581、Ro 25-6981、CP 101-606和NVP-AAM077,采用了一系列可变间隔(VI)强化程序。这些任务中所表现出的动机方面很可能在精神分裂症中受损,并且无疑会影响执行更复杂的显性认知任务的能力。
初步的自发活动评估表明,除了偏好NR2A亚基的拮抗剂NVP-AAM077外,所有测试的拮抗剂都能诱发多动,尽管其程度、性质和时间特征有很大差异。从所使用的VI试验中可以明显看出三种不同的拮抗剂效应模式:(S)-(+)-氯胺酮、美金刚和NVP-AAM077导致反应均匀减少,偏好NR2B亚基的拮抗剂Ro 25-6981和CP 101-606导致反应均匀增加,而PCP、SDZ 220,581和MK-801则产生可变的双向效应。
尽管名义上作用机制相同且常被认为具有生物学等效性,但所测试的NMDA拮抗剂对工具性动作的表达产生了非常多样的影响。反应的其他方面未受影响,包括转换和匹配行为以及对条件刺激做出反应的能力。这些发现对精神分裂症精神病症状动物模型的意义是多方面的。