Suppr超能文献

多重压力背景下生态系统损害的诊断——如何制定有效的流域管理计划。

Diagnosis of ecosystem impairment in a multiple-stress context--how to formulate effective river basin management plans.

作者信息

de Zwart Dick, Posthuma Leo, Gevrey Muriel, von der Ohe Peter C, de Deckere Eric

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Laboratory for Ecological Risk Assessment (LER), PO Box 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Jan;5(1):38-49. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2008-030.1.

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) of the European Union requires member states to attain a good ecological status for all water bodies by the year 2015. This implies that the bioecological protection endpoint itself is upfront, next to abiotic chemical quality standards, as tools to protect those endpoints. Within the requirements of the Directive, ecological status and abiotic conditions will be monitored extensively. Based on the analysis of the monitoring data, authorities are required to derive Programs of Measures (PoMs) for impacted sites. Optimization of these programs requires diagnosis, to provide site-specific or catchment-specific information on the causes of observed deviations from a good ecological status. This article shows one pilot analysis of monitoring data (Scheldt River, Belgium) compiled in the scope of the EU MODELKEY project. Ecological, ecotoxicological, and statistical models are combined to quantify local ecological impact magnitudes and to identify site-specific factors that are associated with those impacts. Results show significant ecological effects in terms of taxa loss at study sites, which are highly variable among sites, with variable combinations of environmental factors associated with those effects. The results of the diagnostic approach are discussed, which appear to be complementary to the assessment of chemical status required by the Directive. Both types of assessment are useful to assist in the derivation of optimized PoMs. In addition, it could be concluded that the acute toxic pressure parameter relates to reduced taxon abundance for more than half of the studied taxa and that this parameter relates to the fraction of taxa lost under field conditions. Finally, various lessons for the execution of monitoring programs are derived because the Scheldt (bio)monitoring data set has its weaknesses, although it can be seen as typical for current monitoring programs.

摘要

欧盟的《水框架指令》(WFD)要求成员国到2015年使所有水体达到良好的生态状态。这意味着生物生态保护终点本身是首要的,仅次于非生物化学质量标准,作为保护这些终点的工具。在该指令的要求范围内,将广泛监测生态状态和非生物条件。根据监测数据分析,当局需要为受影响的地点制定措施方案(PoMs)。这些方案的优化需要进行诊断,以提供关于观察到的偏离良好生态状态原因的特定地点或集水区特定信息。本文展示了在欧盟MODELKEY项目范围内汇编的监测数据(比利时斯海尔德河)的一项试点分析。生态、生态毒理学和统计模型相结合,以量化当地生态影响程度,并确定与这些影响相关的特定地点因素。结果表明,研究地点在分类单元损失方面存在显著的生态影响,各地点之间差异很大,且与这些影响相关的环境因素组合各不相同。讨论了诊断方法的结果,这些结果似乎是对该指令要求的化学状态评估的补充。这两种评估类型都有助于推导优化的措施方案。此外,可以得出结论,急性毒性压力参数与超过一半的研究分类单元的分类单元丰度降低有关,并且该参数与野外条件下损失的分类单元比例有关。最后,由于斯海尔德河(生物)监测数据集存在弱点,尽管它可被视为当前监测计划的典型代表,但从中得出了执行监测计划的各种经验教训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验