Shapiro E D, Berg A T, Austrian R, Schroeder D, Parcells V, Margolis A, Adair R K, Clemens J D
Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06510-8064.
N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 21;325(21):1453-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199111213252101.
Although the protective efficacy of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine has been demonstrated in randomized trials in young African gold miners, there has been controversy about its efficacy in older Americans at risk for serious pneumococcal infections. To assess the vaccine's protective efficacy against invasive pneumococcal infections, we conducted a hospital-based case-control study of the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccine in adults with a condition recognized to be an indication for receiving the vaccine.
From 1984 to 1990, adults in whom Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from any normally sterile site were identified by prospective surveillance in the microbiology laboratories of 11 large hospitals; those with an indication for pneumococcal vaccine were enrolled as case patients. For each case patient, one control was matched according to age, underlying illness, and site of hospitalization. We contacted all providers of medical care to ascertain each subject's history of immunization with pneumococcal vaccine. Isolates of S. pneumoniae were serotyped by an investigator unaware of the subject's vaccination history.
Thirteen percent of the 1,054 case patients and 20 percent of the 1,054 matched controls had received pneumococcal vaccine (P less than 0.001). When vaccine was given in either its 14-valent or its 23-valent form, its aggregate protective efficacy (calculated as a percentage: 1 minus the odds ratio of having been vaccinated times 100) against infections caused by the serotypes represented in the vaccine was 56 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 42 percent to 67 percent; P less than 0.00001) for all 983 patients infected with a serotype represented in the vaccine, 61 percent for a subgroup of 808 immunocompetent patients (95 percent confidence interval, 47 percent to 72 percent; P less than 0.00001), and 21 percent for a subgroup of 175 immunocompromised patients (95 percent confidence interval, -55 percent to 60 percent; P = 0.48). The vaccine was not efficacious against infections caused by serotypes not represented in the vaccine (protective efficacy, -73 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -263 percent to 18 percent; P = 0.15).
Polyvalent pneumococcal vaccine is efficacious in preventing invasive pneumococcal infections in immunocompetent patients with indications for its administration. This vaccine should be used more widely.
尽管肺炎球菌多糖疫苗的保护效力已在非洲年轻金矿工人的随机试验中得到证实,但对于其在有严重肺炎球菌感染风险的美国老年人中的效力一直存在争议。为评估该疫苗对侵袭性肺炎球菌感染的保护效力,我们针对有公认的接种疫苗指征的成年人开展了一项基于医院的肺炎球菌疫苗效力病例对照研究。
1984年至1990年期间,通过对11家大型医院微生物实验室的前瞻性监测,确定从任何通常无菌部位分离出肺炎链球菌的成年人;有肺炎球菌疫苗接种指征的患者被纳入病例组。对于每例病例患者,根据年龄、基础疾病和住院地点匹配一名对照。我们联系了所有医疗服务提供者,以确定每位受试者的肺炎球菌疫苗接种史。由一名对受试者疫苗接种史不知情的研究人员对肺炎链球菌分离株进行血清分型。
1054例病例患者中有13%接种了肺炎球菌疫苗,1054例匹配对照中有20%接种了该疫苗(P<0.001)。当以14价或23价形式接种疫苗时,其对疫苗中所含血清型引起的感染的总体保护效力(以百分比计算:1减去接种疫苗的比值比乘以100),对于所有983例感染疫苗中所含血清型的患者为56%(95%置信区间,42%至67%;P<0.00001),对于808例免疫功能正常患者亚组为61%(可信区间,47%至72%;P<0.00001),对于175例免疫功能低下患者亚组为21%(95%置信区间,-55%至60%;P=0.48)。该疫苗对疫苗中未包含的血清型引起的感染无效(保护效力,-73%;95%置信区间,-263%至18%;P=0.15)。
多价肺炎球菌疫苗对有接种指征的免疫功能正常患者预防侵袭性肺炎球菌感染有效。该疫苗应更广泛地使用。