de Smet Marc D, Gandorfer Arnd, Stalmans Peter, Veckeneer Marc, Feron Eric, Pakola Steve, Kampik Anselm
Department of Ophthalmology, ZNA Middelheim Campus, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1349-55, 1355.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.051. Epub 2009 May 17.
To evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of 4 doses and several exposure times of intravitreal microplasmin given before pars plana vitrectomy for vitreomacular traction maculopathy.
A multicenter, prospective, uncontrolled, dose-escalation, phase I/II clinical trial.
Sixty patients enrolled into 6 successive cohorts.
A single intravitreal injection of microplasmin at 1 of 4 doses (25, 50, 75, or 125 microg in 100 microl) administered either 1 to 2 hours, 24 hours, or 7 days before planned pars plana vitrectomy.
For safety, a complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, Humphrey visual fields, and electrophysiology; for efficacy, posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) induction as assessed by B-scan ultrasound and ease of PVD induction at the time of vitrectomy.
The use of microplasmin led to a progressively higher incidence of PVD induction on ultrasonography with increasing time exposure. A PVD before surgery was observed with 25 microg microplasmin in 0, 2, and 5 patients with increasing exposures (2 hours, 24 hours, 7 days). With increasing dose, a PVD before surgery was observed by ultrasound as follows: 25 microg, 0; 50 microg, 1; 75 microg, 2; 125 microg, 3. However, at surgery, with a 125-microg dose, these patients had a discontinuous layer of vitreous present on the retinal surface resulting from the induction of an anomalous PVD in the form of vitreoschisis. One retinal detachment developed shortly after administration of microplasmin. Two developed after surgery. There were no other safety concerns.
Results from this initial clinical trial evaluating intravitreal microplasmin show the drug to be well tolerated and capable of inducing a pharmacologic PVD in some patients. These results warrant evaluation of microplasmin in larger, controlled trials.
评估在玻璃体黄斑牵拉性黄斑病变的扁平部玻璃体切除术前给予4种剂量及不同暴露时间的玻璃体内微纤溶酶的安全性和初步疗效。
一项多中心、前瞻性、非对照、剂量递增的I/II期临床试验。
60名患者被纳入6个连续队列。
在计划的扁平部玻璃体切除术前1至2小时、24小时或7天,以4种剂量(100微升中含25、50、75或125微克)之一单次玻璃体内注射微纤溶酶。
安全性方面,进行全面眼科检查、眼底照相、荧光素血管造影、Humphrey视野检查和电生理检查;疗效方面,通过B超评估后玻璃体脱离(PVD)的诱导情况以及玻璃体切除时PVD诱导的难易程度。
随着暴露时间增加,使用微纤溶酶导致超声检查中PVD诱导发生率逐渐升高。术前观察到PVD的情况如下:25微克微纤溶酶,暴露时间增加(2小时、24小时、7天)时分别为0例、2例和5例。随着剂量增加,术前超声观察到PVD的情况如下:25微克,0例;50微克,1例;75微克,2例;125微克,3例。然而,在手术时,125微克剂量组的这些患者视网膜表面存在不连续的玻璃体层,这是由于诱导了玻璃体劈裂形式的异常PVD所致。1例视网膜脱离在微纤溶酶给药后不久发生。2例在手术后发生。无其他安全问题。
这项评估玻璃体内微纤溶酶的初步临床试验结果表明,该药物耐受性良好,且在部分患者中能够诱导药物性PVD。这些结果值得在更大规模的对照试验中对微纤溶酶进行评估。