Wachtel Ruth E, Dexter Franklin
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1902-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819f9fd2.
Tardiness from scheduled start times is a common source of frustration for both operating room (OR) personnel and patients. Factors that influence tardiness were quantified in a companion paper and have been used to develop interventions that have the potential for reducing tardiness.
Data from two surgical suites were used to compare the effectiveness of several interventions to reduce tardiness, including i) moving cases to different ORs on the afternoon of surgery, ii) recalculating the OR schedule when it is published to correct for average lateness in first cases of the day, iii) recalculating the OR schedule when it is published to correct for average service-specific case duration bias, and iv) scheduling a gap (time buffer) before the cases of a "to follow" surgeon if the day is expected to end early. These last three interventions involve creation of a modified schedule with revised start times that are more accurate for both patient and "to follow" surgeon. The surgeon performing the first case of the day would not be affected.
Moving cases to different ORs when a room was running late produced a 50%-70% reduction in the tardiness for those cases that were moved. However, overall tardiness in each suite was reduced by only 6%-9%, because few cases were moved. Scheduling a gap between surgeons if the day was expected to end early reduced tardiness by more than 50% for those cases that were preceded by gaps. However, overall tardiness in each suite was reduced by only 4%-8%, because few gaps could be scheduled. In contrast, correcting for the combination of lateness in first cases of the day and service-specific case duration bias reduced overall tardiness in each suite by 30%-35%.
Interventions which involve small numbers of cases have little potential to reduce overall tardiness. Generating a modified or auxiliary OR schedule that compensates for known causes of tardiness can significantly reduce patient and "to follow" surgeon waiting times. Modifying the OR schedule to create revised start times for patients and "to follow" surgeons involves interventions that are simple to perform. The official schedule is not changed and case sequencing is not altered. Results do not depend on changing surgeon, anesthesia provider, or nursing behavior.
手术开始时间延迟是手术室工作人员和患者共同面临的常见困扰来源。在一篇相关论文中对影响延迟的因素进行了量化,并已用于制定有可能减少延迟的干预措施。
使用来自两个手术套房的数据来比较几种减少延迟的干预措施的效果,包括:i)在手术当天下午将病例转移到不同的手术室;ii)在发布手术安排表时重新计算,以校正当天首例手术的平均延迟时间;iii)在发布手术安排表时重新计算,以校正特定服务的平均病例持续时间偏差;iv)如果预计当天结束较早,则在“后续”外科医生的病例之前安排一个间隙(时间缓冲)。最后这三种干预措施涉及创建一个修改后的时间表,其开始时间经过修订,对患者和“后续”外科医生来说都更准确。当天进行首例手术的外科医生不受影响。
当一个手术室延迟时将病例转移到不同的手术室,对于那些被转移的病例,延迟减少了50%-70%。然而,每个套房的总体延迟仅减少了6%-9%,因为转移的病例很少。如果预计当天结束较早,在外科医生之间安排间隙,对于那些前面有间隙的病例,延迟减少了5