Rovner Eric S, Lebed Brett D
Department of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jul;19(4):362-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832a1f46.
Many operations have been developed to treat stress urinary incontinence and yet, at present, there is no consensus about whether there is a single best surgery for all patients with this condition. Can a consensus be reached to determine the best surgical procedure? Can one surgery be successful for patients with varied characteristics, or should a specific procedure be applied to each individual patient?
There are many factors to consider when choosing an operation for stress urinary incontinence in an individual patient. Body habitus, prior pelvic surgery, including prior antiincontinence surgery, urethral function or obstruction or both, and the presence or absence of vaginal wall prolapse can all significantly impact on the potential surgical intervention. These characteristics may affect the choice of procedure with respect to optimizing a favorable outcome or minimizing the risk of a poor outcome or associated complications.
At present, there is no evidence to support the notion that there exists a single best operative intervention for all patients with stress urinary incontinence. There is a small but slowly developing literature base by which to guide the choice of surgical procedure for contemporary treatment of stress urinary incontinence in individual patients.
已经开发出多种手术来治疗压力性尿失禁,但目前对于所有患有这种疾病的患者是否存在单一的最佳手术方法尚无共识。能否达成共识以确定最佳手术方法?一种手术能否对具有不同特征的患者都取得成功,还是应该针对每个患者采用特定的手术方法?
为个体患者选择压力性尿失禁手术时,有许多因素需要考虑。身体体型、既往盆腔手术,包括既往抗尿失禁手术、尿道功能或梗阻或两者皆有,以及是否存在阴道壁脱垂,都会对潜在的手术干预产生重大影响。这些特征可能会影响手术方法的选择,以优化良好结果或最小化不良结果或相关并发症的风险。
目前,没有证据支持对于所有压力性尿失禁患者存在单一最佳手术干预的观点。有一个规模虽小但在缓慢发展的文献基础,可用于指导为个体患者选择当代压力性尿失禁治疗的手术方法。