Powell Sarah R, Fuchs Lynn S, Fuchs Douglas, Cirino Paul T, Fletcher Jack M
Vanderbilt University.
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2009;24(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.01272.x.
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of fact retrieval tutoring as a function of math difficulty (MD) subtype, that is, whether students have MD alone (MD-only) or have concurrent difficulty with math and reading (MDRD). Third graders (n = 139) at two sites were randomly assigned, blocking by site and MD subtype, to four tutoring conditions: fact retrieval practice, conceptual fact retrieval instruction with practice, procedural computation/estimation instruction, and control (no tutoring). Tutoring occurred for 45 sessions over 15weeks for 15-25 minutes per session. Results provided evidence of an interaction between tutoring condition and MD subtype status for assessment of fact retrieval. For MD-only students, students in both fact retrieval conditions achieved comparably and outperformed MD-only students in the control group as well as those in the procedural computation/estimation instruction group. By contrast, for MDRD students, there were no significant differences among intervention conditions.
本研究的目的是评估事实检索辅导作为数学难度(MD)亚型的一个函数的效果,也就是说,学生是仅存在数学困难(仅MD)还是同时存在数学和阅读困难(MDRD)。来自两个地点的三年级学生(n = 139),按地点和MD亚型进行分组,被随机分配到四种辅导条件下:事实检索练习、概念性事实检索指导与练习、程序性计算/估算指导以及对照组(无辅导)。辅导在15周内进行45次,每次15 - 25分钟。结果表明,在事实检索评估方面,辅导条件与MD亚型状态之间存在交互作用。对于仅MD的学生,两种事实检索条件下的学生表现相当,且优于对照组中的仅MD学生以及程序性计算/估算指导组的学生。相比之下,对于MDRD学生,各干预条件之间没有显著差异。