Suppr超能文献

脉冲疗法与每日口服环磷酰胺用于抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎诱导缓解的随机试验

Pulse versus daily oral cyclophosphamide for induction of remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a randomized trial.

作者信息

de Groot Kirsten, Harper Lorraine, Jayne David R W, Flores Suarez Luis Felipe, Gregorini Gina, Gross Wolfgang L, Luqmani Rashid, Pusey Charles D, Rasmussen Niels, Sinico Renato A, Tesar Vladimir, Vanhille Philippe, Westman Kerstin, Savage Caroline O S

机构信息

Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 19;150(10):670-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-10-200905190-00004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current therapies for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis are limited by toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pulse cyclophosphamide with daily oral cyclophosphamide for induction of remission.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial. Random assignments were computer-generated; allocation was concealed by faxing centralized treatment assignment to providers at the time of enrollment. Patients, investigators, and assessors of outcomes were not blinded to assignment.

SETTING

42 centers in 12 European countries.

PATIENTS

149 patients who had newly diagnosed generalized ANCA-associated vasculitis with renal involvement but not immediately life-threatening disease.

INTERVENTION

Pulse cyclophosphamide, 15 mg/kg every 2 to 3 weeks (76 patients), or daily oral cyclophosphamide, 2 mg/kg per day (73 patients), plus prednisolone.

MEASUREMENT

Time to remission (primary outcome); change in renal function, adverse events, and cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Groups did not differ in time to remission (hazard ratio, 1.098 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.55]; P = 0.59) or proportion of patients who achieved remission at 9 months (88.1% vs. 87.7%). Thirteen patients in the pulse group and 6 in the daily oral group achieved remission by 9 months and subsequently had relapse. Absolute cumulative cyclophosphamide dose in the daily oral group was greater than that in the pulse group (15.9 g [interquartile range, 11 to 22.5 g] vs. 8.2 g [interquartile range, 5.95 to 10.55 g]; P < 0.001). The pulse group had a lower rate of leukopenia (hazard ratio, 0.41 [CI, 0.23 to 0.71]).

LIMITATIONS

The study was not powered to detect a difference in relapse rates between the 2 groups. Duration of follow-up was limited.

CONCLUSION

The pulse cyclophosphamide regimen induced remission of ANCA-associated vasculitis as well as the daily oral regimen at a reduced cumulative cyclophosphamide dose and caused fewer cases of leukopenia.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The European Union.

摘要

背景

抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎的现有治疗方法受到毒性的限制。

目的

比较脉冲环磷酰胺与每日口服环磷酰胺诱导缓解的效果。

设计

随机对照试验。随机分配由计算机生成;在入组时通过向提供者传真集中治疗分配来隐藏分配情况。患者、研究者和结果评估者对分配情况不设盲。

设置

12个欧洲国家的42个中心。

患者

149例新诊断的伴有肾脏受累但并非立即危及生命的全身性ANCA相关血管炎患者。

干预

脉冲环磷酰胺,每2至3周15mg/kg(76例患者),或每日口服环磷酰胺,每日2mg/kg(73例患者),加泼尼松龙。

测量

缓解时间(主要结局);肾功能变化、不良事件和环磷酰胺累积剂量(次要结局)。

结果

两组在缓解时间(风险比,1.098[95%CI,0.78至1.55];P=0.59)或9个月时达到缓解的患者比例(88.1%对87.7%)方面无差异。脉冲组13例患者和每日口服组6例患者在9个月时达到缓解,随后复发。每日口服组的环磷酰胺绝对累积剂量大于脉冲组(15.9g[四分位间距,11至22.5g]对8.2g[四分位间距,5.95至10.55g];P<0.001)。脉冲组白细胞减少率较低(风险比,0.41[CI,0.23至0.71])。

局限性

该研究没有足够的能力检测两组之间复发率的差异。随访时间有限。

结论

脉冲环磷酰胺方案诱导ANCA相关血管炎缓解的效果与每日口服方案相同,且环磷酰胺累积剂量降低,白细胞减少病例较少。

主要资金来源

欧盟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验