Suppr超能文献

群居养老院对老年痴呆症患者的影响:与传统养老院护理的比较。

The effects of group living homes on older people with dementia: a comparison with traditional nursing home care.

机构信息

Program on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;24(9):970-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2205.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of group living homes on quality of life and functioning of people with dementia.

METHODS

The study had a quasi-experimental design with a baseline measurement on admission and an effect measurement six months later. Participants were 67 residents in 19 group living homes and 97 residents in seven traditional nursing homes. DQOL and QUALIDEM measured quality of life, functional status was examined with MMSE, IDDD, RMBPC, NPI-Q and RISE from RAI. Use of psychotropic drugs and physical restraints was also assessed. Linear and logistic regression analyses analyzed the data.

RESULTS

After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, residents of group living homes needed less help with ADL and were more socially engaged. There were no differences in behavioral problems or cognitive status. Also after adjusting, two of the 12 quality of life subscales differed between the groups. Residents of group living homes had more sense of aesthetics and had more to do. While there were no differences in prescription of psychotropic drugs, residents of group living homes had less physical restraints.

CONCLUSIONS

Group living homes had some beneficial effects on its residents, but traditional nursing homes performed well as well. Possible study limitations included the baseline differences between the study groups and the use of different informants on T0 and T1. Future nursing home care may very well be a combination of the best group living care and traditional nursing home care have to offer.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨群居之家对痴呆症患者生活质量和功能的影响。

方法

本研究采用准实验设计,在入院时进行基线测量,6 个月后进行效果测量。参与者包括 19 个群居之家的 67 名居民和 7 个传统养老院的 97 名居民。DQOL 和 QUALIDEM 衡量生活质量,使用 MMSE、IDDD、RMBPC、NPI-Q 和 RAI 的 RISE 评估功能状态。还评估了精神药物和身体约束的使用情况。线性和逻辑回归分析用于分析数据。

结果

调整基线特征差异后,群居之家的居民在日常生活活动方面需要的帮助较少,社交参与度更高。行为问题或认知状态没有差异。调整后,两组在 12 个生活质量子量表中的两个存在差异。群居之家的居民更有美感,也有更多的事情可做。虽然精神药物的处方没有差异,但群居之家的居民身体约束较少。

结论

群居之家对其居民有一些有益的影响,但传统养老院的表现也很好。可能的研究限制包括研究组之间的基线差异以及在 T0 和 T1 时使用不同的信息来源。未来的养老院护理可能是最好的群居护理和传统养老院护理的结合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验