Mandak J, Pojar M, Cibicek N, Lonsky V, Palicka V, Kakrdova D, Nedvidkova J, Kubicek J, Zivny P
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Perfusion. 2008 Nov;23(6):339-46. doi: 10.1177/0267659109105359.
The aim of this study was to monitor and compare the changes in metabolism and blood flow in the skeletal muscles during cardiac operations performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and operations without CPB (off-pump) by means of interstitial microdialysis (Figure 1). Surgical revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), was performed in 40 patients randomized to two groups. Twenty patients (On-Pump Group) were operated on using CPB, 20 patients (Off-Pump Group) were operated on without CPB. Interstitial microdialysis was performed by 2 probes of a CMA 60 (CMA Microdialysis AB, Solna, Sweden) inserted into the patient's deltoid muscle. Microdialysis measurements were performed at 30-minute intervals. Glucose, lactate, pyruvate and glycerol as markers of basic metabolism and tissue perfusion were measured in samples from the first probe, using a CMA 600 Analyzer (CMA Microdialysis AB). Blood flow through the interstitium was monitored by means of dynamic microdialysis of ethanol as a flow-marker in the dialysates taken from the second probe (ethanol dilution technique). Results in both the groups were statistically processed and compared. Both the groups were similar in respect of preoperative characteristics. Dynamic changes of interstitial concentrations of the measured analytes were found in both the patient groups (on-pump vs. off-pump) during the operation. There was no significant difference in dialysate concentrations of glucose and lactate between the groups. Significant differences were detected in pyruvate and glycerol interstitial concentrations, lactate/pyruvate ratio and lactate/glucose ratio between the on-pump vs. off-pump patients. In the Off-Pump Group, pyruvate concentrations were higher and the values of concentrations of glycerol lower. The lactate/pyruvate ratio and the lactate/glucose ratio, indicating the aerobic and anaerobic tissue metabolism status, were lower in the Off-Pump Group. There was no significant difference in dialysate concentrations of ethanol as a flow-marker during the surgery in either of the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (On-Pump Group vs. Off-Pump Group) comparing the postoperative clinical outcome (ICU stay, ventilation duration, length of hospital stay). The dynamic changes in the interstitial concentrations of the glucose, glycerol, pyruvate and lactate were found in both the groups of patients (On-Pump Group and Off-Pump Group), but there was no difference in local blood flow when the ethanol dilution technique was used. These results showed significantly higher aerobic metabolic activity of the peripheral tissue of patients in the Off-Pump Group vs. the On-Pump Group during the course of cardiac revascularization surgery. Results suggest that extracorporeal circulation, cardiopulmonary bypass, compromises peripheral tissue (skeletal muscles) energy metabolism. These changes have no impact on the postoperative clinical outcome; no significant difference between the groups was found.
本研究的目的是通过组织间微透析技术(图1),监测并比较在体外循环(CPB)心脏手术和非体外循环(非体外循环)手术过程中骨骼肌的代谢和血流变化。40例患者随机分为两组,进行外科血运重建,即冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。20例患者(体外循环组)采用CPB进行手术,20例患者(非体外循环组)不采用CPB进行手术。通过将两根CMA 60(瑞典索尔纳市CMA微透析公司)探头插入患者三角肌进行组织间微透析。微透析测量每隔30分钟进行一次。使用CMA 600分析仪(CMA微透析公司)对第一根探头采集的样本中的葡萄糖、乳酸、丙酮酸和甘油进行测量,作为基础代谢和组织灌注的标志物。通过对取自第二根探头的透析液中的乙醇进行动态微透析(乙醇稀释技术),监测组织间的血流。对两组结果进行统计学处理和比较。两组患者术前特征相似。手术过程中,两组患者(体外循环组与非体外循环组)均发现所测分析物的组织间浓度有动态变化。两组间葡萄糖和乳酸的透析液浓度无显著差异。体外循环组与非体外循环组患者在丙酮酸和甘油的组织间浓度、乳酸/丙酮酸比值以及乳酸/葡萄糖比值方面存在显著差异。在非体外循环组中,丙酮酸浓度较高,甘油浓度较低。非体外循环组中表明有氧和无氧组织代谢状态的乳酸/丙酮酸比值和乳酸/葡萄糖比值较低。两组手术过程中作为血流标志物的乙醇透析液浓度均无显著差异。两组(体外循环组与非体外循环组)在术后临床结局(重症监护病房停留时间、通气时间、住院时间)方面无统计学显著差异。两组患者(体外循环组和非体外循环组)均发现葡萄糖、甘油、丙酮酸和乳酸的组织间浓度有动态变化,但采用乙醇稀释技术时局部血流无差异。这些结果表明,在心脏血运重建手术过程中,非体外循环组患者外周组织的有氧代谢活性显著高于体外循环组。结果表明,体外循环会损害外周组织(骨骼肌)的能量代谢。这些变化对术后临床结局无影响;两组间未发现显著差异。