Facco Francesca, You Whitney, Grobman William
From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;113(6):1206-1216. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a6e96a.
To estimate the relationship between inherited thrombophilias and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) using meta-analytic techniques.
A literature review identified case-control and cohort studies evaluating the relationship between IUGR and the following thrombophilias: homozygous or heterozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin (PT) G20210A mutations and homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation. Using mixed effects and random-effects models, the association between thrombophilias and IUGR was explored. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and corrected for with Duval and Tweedie's trim-and-fill method.
The following number of related studies were found: studies evaluating relationships between factor V Leiden mutation and IUGR, 12 case-control and four cohort; between PT mutation and IUGR, 11 case-control and 0 cohort; and between MTHFR C677T homozygosity and IUGR, 10 case-control and two cohort. The overall summary odds ratio (OR) for the association between factor V Leiden and IUGR was significant (OR 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.44); however, this was mainly driven by the positive association seen in the case-control studies (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.17-3.12). The association between PT and IUGR was only explored in case-control studies yielding a summary OR that was not significant (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.98-2.35). The overall summary OR for the association between MTHFR and IUGR was not significant (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88-1.17), but was significant for the case-control studies alone (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.75). For both factor V Leiden and MTHFR mutations, a funnel-plot analysis of the case-control studies suggests publication bias. When the trim-and fill-method was used to correct for the publication bias, these summary estimates were no longer significant.
The association between inherited thrombophilias and IUGR can only be discerned in case-control studies and seems to be largely because of publication bias.
III.
采用荟萃分析技术评估遗传性血栓形成倾向与宫内生长受限(IUGR)之间的关系。
通过文献综述确定了评估IUGR与以下血栓形成倾向之间关系的病例对照研究和队列研究:纯合或杂合因子V莱顿突变或凝血酶原(PT)G20210A突变以及纯合亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(MTHFR)C677T突变。使用混合效应和随机效应模型探讨血栓形成倾向与IUGR之间的关联。用漏斗图评估发表偏倚,并用Duval和Tweedie的修剪填充法进行校正。
发现了以下相关研究数量:评估因子V莱顿突变与IUGR之间关系的研究,12项病例对照研究和4项队列研究;PT突变与IUGR之间的研究,11项病例对照研究和0项队列研究;MTHFR C677T纯合性与IUGR之间的研究,10项病例对照研究和2项队列研究。因子V莱顿与IUGR之间关联的总体汇总比值比(OR)具有统计学意义(OR 1.23,95%置信区间[CI] 1.04 - 1.44);然而,这主要是由病例对照研究中观察到的正相关驱动的(OR 1.91,95% CI 1.17 - 3.12)。PT与IUGR之间的关联仅在病例对照研究中进行了探讨,得出的汇总OR无统计学意义(OR 1.52,95% CI 0.98 - 2.35)。MTHFR与IUGR之间关联的总体汇总OR无统计学意义(OR 1.01,95% CI 0.88 - 1.17),但仅在病例对照研究中有统计学意义(OR 1.35,95% CI 1.04 - 1.75)。对于因子V莱顿和MTHFR突变,病例对照研究的漏斗图分析表明存在发表偏倚。当使用修剪填充法校正发表偏倚时,这些汇总估计不再具有统计学意义。
遗传性血栓形成倾向与IUGR之间的关联仅在病例对照研究中可识别,且似乎很大程度上是由于发表偏倚。
III级。