Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Derby Richard, Wolfer Lee, Singh Vijay, Datta Sukdeb, Hirsch Joshua A
Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, USA.
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40.
Diagnosis is a critical component of health care. The world of diagnostic tests is highly dynamic. New tests are developed at a fast pace and technology of existing tests is continuously being improved. However, clinicians, policy makers, and patients routinely face a range of questions regarding diagnostic tests. Well designed diagnostic test accuracy studies can help in making these decisions, provided that they transparently and fully report their participants, tests, methods, and results (as facilitated). For example, by the standards for the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) statement. Exaggerated and biased results from poorly designed and reported diagnostic test studies can trigger their premature dissemination and lead physicians into making incorrect treatment decisions. Thus, a diagnostic test is useful only to the extent that it distinguishes between conditions or disorders that might otherwise be confused. While almost any test can differentiate healthy persons from severely affected ones, appropriate diagnostic tests should differentiate mild and moderate forms of disease. Shortcomings in a study design and interpretation can affect estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Thus, quality diagnostic studies are essential in medicine in general and interventional pain management in particular. The STARD initiative was developed to improve the accuracy and completeness in the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy and provide guidance to assist in reducing the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate a study's generalizability. In the practice of interventional pain management, in addition to diagnostic tests which include laboratory tests, imaging tests, and physical examination, diagnostic interventional techniques are crucial. Interventional techniques as a diagnostic tool in painful conditions is important due to multiple challenging clinical situations, which include the purely subjective nature of pain and underdetermined and uncertain pathophysiology in most painful spinal conditions. Precision diagnostic blocks are used to clarify these challenging clinical situations in order to determine the pathophysiology of clinical pain, the site of nociception, and the pathway of afferent neural signals. Part 5 of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in interventional pain management describes the various aspects of diagnostic accuracy studies.
诊断是医疗保健的关键组成部分。诊断测试领域变化迅速。新测试以快速的速度开发,现有测试的技术也在不断改进。然而,临床医生、政策制定者和患者经常面临一系列关于诊断测试的问题。精心设计的诊断测试准确性研究有助于做出这些决策,前提是它们透明且全面地报告其参与者、测试、方法和结果(如有便利条件)。例如,按照诊断准确性研究报告标准(STARD)声明。设计和报告不佳的诊断测试研究得出的夸张和有偏差的结果可能会引发其过早传播,并导致医生做出错误的治疗决策。因此,诊断测试只有在能够区分可能被混淆的病症或疾病时才有用。虽然几乎任何测试都能区分健康人和病情严重的人,但合适的诊断测试应能区分轻度和中度疾病形式。研究设计和解释中的缺陷会影响诊断准确性的估计。因此,高质量的诊断研究在一般医学尤其是介入性疼痛管理中至关重要。STARD倡议旨在提高诊断准确性研究报告的准确性和完整性,并提供指导以帮助减少研究中的偏差可能性,并评估研究的可推广性。在介入性疼痛管理实践中,除了包括实验室检查、影像学检查和体格检查在内的诊断测试外,诊断性介入技术也至关重要。由于多种具有挑战性的临床情况,介入技术作为疼痛病症的诊断工具很重要,这些情况包括疼痛的纯粹主观性以及大多数疼痛性脊柱疾病中未明确和不确定的病理生理学。精确诊断性阻滞用于阐明这些具有挑战性的临床情况,以确定临床疼痛的病理生理学、伤害感受部位和传入神经信号通路。介入性疼痛管理中循证医学(EBM)的第5部分描述了诊断准确性研究的各个方面。