Yilmaz Burak, Ozçelik Tuncer Burak, Wee Alvin G
Department of Prosthodontics, Başkent University, Bahcelievler, Cankaya 06490, Ankara, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jun;101(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60085-8.
Although metal ceramic fixed restorations are commonly preferred by clinicians, there remain a limited number of studies on how opaque porcelain color is affected by fabrication procedures, such as the number of firings and types of metal alloys.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of various types of metal alloys on the color of opaque porcelain after repeated firings.
Seven different types of metal ceramic alloys (3 base metals: Metalloy CC, chromium cobalt (B-MCC); Heraenium NA, nickel chromium (B-HNA); Argeloy NP, nickel chromium beryllium (B-ANP); 3 noble metals: Ceradelta, palladium silver (N-CD); Cerapall 2, palladium (N-CP2); V-Delta SF, gold palladium (N-VDSF); and 1 high noble metal: V-Gnathos Plus, gold platinum (HN-GP)) were used to support a 0.1-mm-thick layer of opaque porcelain (IPS d.SIGN Opaquer, shade B1) to determine the metal alloys' effect on the opaque porcelain color after repeated porcelain firings. Opaque porcelain was applied on specimens (16 mm x 1 mm) prepared from each type of alloy. The specimens (n=21) were subjected to 1 opaque firing, 4 consecutive dentin firing cycles, and 1 glaze firing cycle. Delta E values were calculated for all metal alloy groups from opaque firing (control group) to each subsequent firing stage within each tested alloy group. One-way ANOVA and Fisher's least significant difference tests were performed to determine the differences between alloys. In addition, DeltaE values calculated after repeated firings were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and paired t test, to determine whether repeated dentin firing stages affected the color of opaque porcelain (alpha=.05).
After the first and second dentin firings, the color shift in opaque porcelain was significant for all tested alloy groups (P<.001). The color of opaque porcelain changed significantly after the third dentin firing for all groups except for B-HNA and N-VDSF (P<.001). After the fourth dentin firing, the color of opaque porcelain changed significantly for all tested alloy groups (P=.022 for B-ANP, P=.042 for N-VDSF, and P<.001 for remaining alloys). After glaze firing, the color change in opaque porcelain was significant in all but the N-CP2 group (P=.002 for N-VDSF, P=.014 for HN-GP, and P<.001 for remaining alloys). Delta E values showed that B-MCC after the first dentin firing, N-CD after the second dentin firing and glaze firing, and B-ANP after the third and fourth dentin firings showed significantly different DeltaE values than all remaining test alloys (P<.001).
Subsequent porcelain firings significantly affected the color of a 0.1-mm-thick layer of opaque porcelain for all alloys tested. After the third and fourth firings, 1 base metal alloy (B-ANP) showed significantly greater color change than the remaining dental alloys when the color difference was compared to baseline. In addition, the color change in a noble alloy (N-CD) was significantly less than that of the other alloys after glaze firing. However, color shifts after repeated dentin firings were imperceptible (DeltaE<2.6) and clinically acceptable (DeltaE<5.5) for each type of alloy.
尽管金属陶瓷固定修复体是临床医生常用的选择,但关于诸如烧制次数和金属合金类型等制作程序如何影响不透明瓷颜色的研究仍然有限。
本研究的目的是确定不同类型的金属合金在反复烧制后对不透明瓷颜色的影响。
使用七种不同类型的金属陶瓷合金(3种贱金属:Metalloy CC,铬钴合金(B-MCC);Heraenium NA,镍铬合金(B-HNA);Argeloy NP,镍铬铍合金(B-ANP);3种贵金属:Ceradelta,钯银合金(N-CD);Cerapall 2,钯合金(N-CP2);V-Delta SF,金钯合金(N-VDSF);以及1种高贵金属:V-Gnathos Plus,金铂合金(HN-GP))来支撑一层0.1毫米厚的不透明瓷(IPS d.SIGN遮色瓷,B1色),以确定金属合金在反复烧制瓷后对不透明瓷颜色的影响。将不透明瓷应用于由每种合金制备的试样(16毫米×1毫米)上。对试样(n = 21)进行1次不透明烧制、4个连续的牙本质烧制循环和1次釉面烧制循环。计算每个测试合金组从不透明烧制(对照组)到每个后续烧制阶段的所有金属合金组的ΔE值。进行单因素方差分析和Fisher最小显著差异检验以确定合金之间的差异。此外,通过单因素方差分析和配对t检验分析反复烧制后计算的ΔE值,以确定反复的牙本质烧制阶段是否会影响不透明瓷的颜色(α = 0.05)。
在第一次和第二次牙本质烧制后,所有测试合金组中不透明瓷的颜色变化均具有显著性(P <.001)。除B-HNA和N-VDSF外,所有组在第三次牙本质烧制后不透明瓷的颜色均发生了显著变化(P <.001)。在第四次牙本质烧制后,所有测试合金组中不透明瓷的颜色均发生了显著变化(B-ANP为P = 0.022,N-VDSF为P = 0.042,其余合金为P <.001)。在釉面烧制后,除N-CP2组外,所有组中不透明瓷的颜色变化均具有显著性(N-VDSF为P = 0.002,HN-GP为P = 0.014,其余合金为P <.001)。ΔE值表明,第一次牙本质烧制后的B-MCC、第二次牙本质烧制和釉面烧制后的N-CD以及第三次和第四次牙本质烧制后的B-ANP与所有其余测试合金相比,显示出显著不同的ΔE值(P <.001)。
对于所有测试合金,后续的瓷烧制显著影响了0.1毫米厚的不透明瓷层的颜色。在第三次和第四次烧制后,当与基线比较颜色差异时,1种贱金属合金(B-ANP)显示出比其余牙科合金显著更大的颜色变化。此外,一种贵金属合金(N-CD)在釉面烧制后的颜色变化明显小于其他合金。然而,每种合金在反复牙本质烧制后的颜色变化是不可察觉的(ΔE < 2.6)且在临床上是可接受的(ΔE < 5.5)。