文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗慢性下腰痛的双盲随机试验

A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Skljarevski V, Ossanna M, Liu-Seifert H, Zhang Q, Chappell A, Iyengar S, Detke M, Backonja M

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1041-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02648.x. Epub 2009 May 12.


DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02648.x
PMID:19469829
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine has demonstrated analgesic effect in chronic pain states. This study assesses the efficacy of duloxetine in chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: Adult patients with non-radicular CLBP entered this 13-week, double-blind, randomized study comparing duloxetine 20, 60 or 120 mg once daily with placebo. The primary measure was comparison of duloxetine 60 mg with placebo on weekly mean 24-h average pain. Secondary measures included Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24), Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Four hundred four patients were enrolled, 267 completed. No significant differences existed between any dose of duloxetine and placebo on reduction in weekly mean 24-h average pain at end-point. Duloxetine 60 mg was superior to placebo from weeks 3-11 in relieving pain, but not at weeks 12-13. Duloxetine 60 mg demonstrated significant improvement on PGI-I, RMDQ-24, BPI-average pain and BPI-average interference. Significantly more patients taking duloxetine 120 mg (24.1%) discontinued because of adverse events, versus placebo (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine was superior to placebo on the primary objective from weeks 3-11, but superiority was not maintained at end-point. Duloxetine was superior to placebo on many secondary measures, and was well-tolerated.

摘要

背景:度洛西汀已在慢性疼痛状态中显示出镇痛效果。本研究评估度洛西汀在慢性下腰痛(CLBP)中的疗效。 方法:患有非根性CLBP的成年患者进入这项为期13周的双盲随机研究,比较每日一次20毫克、60毫克或120毫克度洛西汀与安慰剂。主要测量指标是比较60毫克度洛西汀与安慰剂在每周平均24小时平均疼痛方面的差异。次要测量指标包括罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ-24)、患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)、简明疼痛量表(BPI)、安全性和耐受性。 结果:共纳入404例患者,267例完成研究。在终点时,任何剂量的度洛西汀与安慰剂在每周平均24小时平均疼痛减轻方面均无显著差异。60毫克度洛西汀在第3至11周缓解疼痛方面优于安慰剂,但在第12至13周并非如此。60毫克度洛西汀在PGI-I、RMDQ-24、BPI平均疼痛和BPI平均干扰方面显示出显著改善。服用120毫克度洛西汀的患者因不良事件停药的比例(24.1%)显著高于安慰剂组(8.5%)。 结论:度洛西汀在第3至11周的主要目标上优于安慰剂,但在终点时优势未维持。度洛西汀在许多次要测量指标上优于安慰剂,且耐受性良好。

相似文献

[1]
A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain.

Eur J Neurol. 2009-9

[2]
Duloxetine versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain: a 12-week, fixed-dose, randomized, double-blind trial.

J Pain. 2010-5-15

[3]
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010-6-1

[4]
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial of Duloxetine Monotherapy in Japanese Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016-11-15

[5]
Escitalopram 20 mg versus duloxetine 60 mg for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010-5

[6]
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine versus placebo in adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019-5-28

[7]
Flexible dosed duloxetine in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

J Rheumatol. 2010-9-15

[8]
An Open-Label, 52-Week, Phase III Trial of Duloxetine in Japanese Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Pain Med. 2019-8-1

[9]
Maintenance of effect of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain: a 41-week uncontrolled, dose-blinded study.

Pain Med. 2010-4-13

[10]
Duloxetine 60 mg once-daily in the treatment of painful physical symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder.

J Psychiatr Res. 2005-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
14. Discogenic Low Back Pain.

Pain Pract. 2025-9

[2]
The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Pain Med. 2025-9-1

[3]
Antidepressants for low back pain and spine-related leg pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-3-10

[4]
Clinical proof-of-concept results with a novel TRPA1 antagonist (LY3526318) in 3 chronic pain states.

Pain. 2024-12-13

[5]
Pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: disparity between synthesized evidence and real-world clinical practice.

Pain Rep. 2024-12-9

[6]
Duloxetine for individuals with chronic back pain: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Exp Ther Med. 2024-10-3

[7]
A Meta-analysis Exploring the Efficacy of Neuropathic Pain Medication for Low Back Pain or Spine-Related Leg Pain: Is Efficacy Dependent on the Presence of Neuropathic Pain?

Drugs. 2024-12

[8]
Non-opioid psychiatric medications for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024-10-10

[9]
Efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pain Manag. 2024

[10]
Inhalation of Essential Oil Alleviates Pain and Related Anxiety and Stress in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Moderate to Severe Pain.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023-12-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索