Lips Irene M, van der Heide Uulke A, Kotte Alexis N T J, van Vulpen Marco, Bel Arjan
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Aug 1;74(5):1600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.056. Epub 2009 May 25.
To investigate the influence of translational and rotational errors on prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with an integrated boost to the tumor and to evaluate the effect of the use of an on-line correction protocol.
For 19 patients, who had been treated with prostate IMRT and fiducial marker-based position verification, highly inhomogeneous IMRT plans, including an integrated tumor boost, were made using varying margins (2, 4, 6, and 8 mm). The measured translational and rotational errors were used to calculate the dose using two positioning strategies: an off-line and an on-line protocol to correct the translational shifts. The estimated dose to the targets and the organs at risk was compared with the intended dose.
Residual deviations after off-line correction led to statistically significant, but very small, reductions in dose coverage. Even when a 2-mm margin was used, the average reduction in dose to 99% of the volume was 1.4 +/- 1.9 Gy for the tumor, 1.5 +/- 1.5 Gy for the prostate without seminal vesicles (boost volume), and 4.3 +/- 4.6 Gy, including the seminal vesicles (clinical target volume). Patients with large systematic rotational errors demonstrated a substantial decrease in dose, especially for the clinical target volume. If an on-line correction protocol was used, the average mean dose and dose to 99% of the volume of the targets improved. However, the extensive dose reduction for patients with large rotational errors barely recovered with on-line correction.
For complex prostate IMRT with an integrated tumor boost, the use of an on-line correction protocol yields little improvement without the correction of rotational errors.
研究平移和旋转误差对前列腺调强放疗(IMRT)联合肿瘤区域同步加量的影响,并评估使用在线校正方案的效果。
对于19例接受前列腺IMRT及基于基准标记的位置验证的患者,利用不同的边界(2、4、6和8毫米)制定高度不均匀的IMRT计划,包括肿瘤区域同步加量。使用测量得到的平移和旋转误差,采用两种定位策略计算剂量:一种离线方案和一种在线方案来校正平移位移。将靶区和危及器官的估计剂量与预期剂量进行比较。
离线校正后的残余偏差导致剂量覆盖在统计学上有显著但非常小的降低。即使使用2毫米的边界,肿瘤体积99%的平均剂量降低为1.4±1.9 Gy,无精囊的前列腺(加量体积)为1.5±1.5 Gy,包括精囊的临床靶区体积为4.3±4.6 Gy。存在较大系统旋转误差的患者剂量显著降低,尤其是临床靶区体积。如果使用在线校正方案,靶区的平均平均剂量和体积99%的剂量会有所改善。然而,对于存在较大旋转误差的患者,广泛的剂量降低通过在线校正几乎无法恢复。
对于联合肿瘤区域同步加量的复杂前列腺IMRT,在不校正旋转误差的情况下,使用在线校正方案几乎没有改善。