Krueger Paul M, Dane Peter, Slocum Philip, Kimmelman Marilyn
UMDNJ-School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, USA.
Acad Med. 2009 Jun;84(6):712-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a409b1.
Osteopathic clinical medical education is similar to allopathic medical education in many ways but uniquely different in others. Some of the important differences include an emphasis on primary care, training in osteopathic manipulative medicine, and the reliance on community-based hospitals for clinical training sites.The authors explore the historical roots of osteopathic clinical training, describe the typical osteopathic clinical preparation, and discuss the challenges in delivering this clinical training. They describe the significantly different methods of delivering clinical training in three osteopathic medical schools: a traditional academic medical center, a school utilizing a statewide clinical consortium, and a school that employs a regional campus system.The authors used data from the annual survey of the 20 schools of osteopathic medicine operating in 2005-2006 to describe the typical clinical rotation experience of an osteopathic medical student and analyzed outcome data from the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Exam (COMLEX) Level 2-CE and COMLEX Level 2-PE for each of these three systems of clinical training. The overall success on these examinations by students from all three schools suggests that all three methods of clinical training can be successful.
整骨疗法临床医学生教育在许多方面与对抗疗法医学生教育相似,但在其他方面又独具特色。一些重要的差异包括对初级保健的重视、整骨手法医学培训,以及依赖社区医院作为临床培训地点。作者探讨了整骨疗法临床培训的历史根源,描述了典型的整骨疗法临床准备情况,并讨论了提供这种临床培训所面临的挑战。他们描述了三所整骨医学院提供临床培训的显著不同方法:一所传统学术医学中心、一所利用全州临床联盟的学校,以及一所采用区域校园系统的学校。作者利用2005 - 2006年运营的20所整骨医学院年度调查的数据,描述了整骨医学学生典型的临床轮转经历,并分析了这三种临床培训系统中每一种的综合整骨医学执照考试(COMLEX)2 - CE级和COMLEX 2 - PE级的结果数据。来自所有三所学校的学生在这些考试中的总体成功表明,这三种临床培训方法都可能取得成功。