Institute of Public Health Surveillance (InVS), Saint-Maurice, France.
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 May 28;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-31.
We conducted an ecological study in four French administrative departments and highlighted an excess risk in cancer morbidity for residents around municipal solid waste incinerators. The aim of this paper is to show how important are advanced tools and statistical techniques to better assess weak associations between the risk of cancer and past environmental exposures.
The steps to evaluate the association between the risk of cancer and the exposure to incinerators, from the assessment of exposure to the definition of the confounding variables and the statistical analysis carried out are detailed and discussed. Dispersion modelling was used to assess exposure to sixteen incinerators. A geographical information system was developed to define an index of exposure at the IRIS level that is the geographical unit we considered. Population density, rural/urban status, socio-economic deprivation, exposure to air pollution from traffic and from other industries were considered as potential confounding factors and defined at the IRIS level. Generalized additive models and Bayesian hierarchical models were used to estimate the association between the risk of cancer and the index of exposure to incinerators accounting for the confounding factors.
Modelling to assess the exposure to municipal solid waste incinerators allowed accounting for factors known to influence the exposure (meteorological data, point source characteristics, topography). The statistical models defined allowed modelling extra-Poisson variability and also non-linear relationships between the risk of cancer and the exposure to incinerators and the confounders.
In most epidemiological studies distance is still used as a proxy for exposure. This can lead to significant exposure misclassification. Additionally, in geographical correlation studies the non-linear relationships are usually not accounted for in the statistical analysis. In studies of weak associations it is important to use advanced methods to better assess dose-response relationships with disease risk.
我们在法国四个行政部门进行了一项生态研究,结果表明城市固体废物焚烧炉周围居民的癌症发病率存在超额风险。本文的目的是展示先进的工具和统计技术对于更好地评估癌症风险与过去环境暴露之间的弱关联是多么重要。
详细讨论了从评估暴露到定义混杂变量以及进行统计分析的步骤,以评估癌症风险与焚烧炉暴露之间的关联。使用扩散模型评估 16 个焚烧炉的暴露情况。开发了一个地理信息系统,以在 IRIS 水平上定义暴露指数,这是我们考虑的地理单位。人口密度、农村/城市状况、社会经济贫困、交通和其他行业的空气污染暴露被认为是潜在的混杂因素,并在 IRIS 水平上进行了定义。广义加性模型和贝叶斯层次模型用于估计考虑混杂因素的癌症风险与焚烧炉暴露指数之间的关联。
评估城市固体废物焚烧炉暴露的建模考虑了已知影响暴露的因素(气象数据、点源特征、地形)。定义的统计模型允许对超出泊松分布的变异性以及癌症风险与焚烧炉暴露和混杂因素之间的非线性关系进行建模。
在大多数流行病学研究中,距离仍然被用作暴露的替代物。这可能导致暴露的重大分类错误。此外,在地理相关研究中,统计分析通常不考虑非线性关系。在弱关联研究中,使用先进的方法来更好地评估与疾病风险的剂量反应关系非常重要。