利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺治疗狼疮性肾炎是否比单用利妥昔单抗更好?
Is combination rituximab with cyclophosphamide better than rituximab alone in the treatment of lupus nephritis?
作者信息
Li Edmund K, Tam Lai-Shan, Zhu Tracy Y, Li Martin, Kwok Catherine L, Li Tena K, Leung Ying Ying, Wong Kong Chiu, Szeto Cheuk Chun
机构信息
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
出版信息
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Aug;48(8):892-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep124. Epub 2009 May 28.
OBJECTIVE
To assess if combination rituximab and cyclophosphamide is more effective than rituximab monotherapy as an induction therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis.
METHODS
A randomized open-label pilot study in which 9 patients received rituximab alone and 10 patients received two doses rituximab + intravenous cyclophosphamide. The clinical, laboratory and renal histological changes were assessed after 48 weeks of treatment.
RESULTS
At week 48, four patients had a complete response, 11 patients achieved partial response, 2 patients remained the same or stable and 2 worsened. There were no statistical differences in the proportion of patients with complete or partial response between the two groups. None of the variables was an independent predictor of response at week 48. Nine patients had significant improvement in activity indices in renal biopsies, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. Overall, 18 out of 19 patients were found to have effective B-cell depletion. The median duration of complete B-cell depletion in all patients was 22 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients with complete depletion at weeks 4, 8, 24 and 48 between the two groups except at week 2.
CONCLUSIONS
Rituximab monotherapy appears to be effective as induction therapy in lupus nephritis. The addition of cyclophosphamide offers no additional improvement in clinical, laboratory and renal histological assessment or the duration of B-cell depletion at 48 weeks. Large-scale studies with longer duration are needed to confirm these findings.
目的
评估利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺作为增殖性狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗方案是否比利妥昔单抗单药治疗更有效。
方法
一项随机开放标签的试点研究,9例患者接受单药利妥昔单抗治疗,10例患者接受两剂利妥昔单抗联合静脉注射环磷酰胺治疗。治疗48周后评估临床、实验室及肾脏组织学变化。
结果
在第48周时,4例患者完全缓解,11例患者部分缓解,2例患者病情维持不变或稳定,2例患者病情恶化。两组间完全缓解或部分缓解患者的比例无统计学差异。在第48周时,没有任何变量是反应的独立预测因素。9例患者肾脏活检的活动指数有显著改善,但两组间无显著差异。总体而言,19例患者中有18例出现有效的B细胞清除。所有患者完全B细胞清除的中位持续时间为22周。除第2周外,两组在第4、8、24和48周时完全清除患者的比例无统计学显著差异。
结论
利妥昔单抗单药治疗作为狼疮性肾炎的诱导治疗似乎有效。添加环磷酰胺在临床、实验室及肾脏组织学评估或48周时B细胞清除持续时间方面未带来额外改善。需要开展持续时间更长的大规模研究来证实这些发现。