Suppr超能文献

加拿大处方药直接面向消费者广告的十二年经验:一则警示故事。

Twelve years' experience with direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs in Canada: a cautionary tale.

作者信息

Mintzes Barbara, Morgan Steve, Wright James M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Barbara Mintzes

出版信息

PLoS One. 2009 May 27;4(5):e5699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005699.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs is illegal in Canada as a health protection measure, but is permitted in the United States. However, in 2000, Canadian policy was changed to allow 'reminder' advertising of prescription drugs. This is a form of advertising that states the brand name without health claims. 'Reminder' advertising is prohibited in the US for drugs that have 'black box' warnings of serious risks. This study examines spending on DTCA in Canada from 1995 to 2006, 12 years spanning this policy shift. We ask how annual per capita spending compares to that in the US, and whether drugs with Canadian or US regulatory safety warnings are advertised to the Canadian public in reminder advertising.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Prescription drug advertising spending data were extracted from a data set on health sector spending in Canada obtained from a market research company, TNS Media Inc. Spending was adjusted for inflation and compared with US spending. Inflation-adjusted spending on branded DTCA in Canada grew from under CAD$2 million per year before 1999 to over $22 million in 2006. The major growth was in broadcast advertising, accounting for 83% of spending in 2006. US annual per capita spending was on average 24 times Canadian levels. Celebrex (celecoxib), which has a US black box and was subject to three safety advisories in Canada, was the most heavily advertised drug on Canadian television in 2005 and 2006. Of 8 brands with >$500,000 spending, which together accounted for 59% of branded DTCA in all media, 6 were subject to Canadian safety advisories, and 4 had US black box warnings.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Branded 'reminder' advertising has grown rapidly in Canada since 2000, mainly due to a growth in television advertising. Although DTCA spending per capita is much lower in Canada than in the US, there is no evidence of safer content or product choice; many heavily-advertised drugs in Canada have been subject to safety advisories. For governments searching for compromise solutions to industry pressure for expanded advertising, Canada's experience stands as a stark warning.

摘要

背景

作为一项健康保护措施,处方药的直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA)在加拿大是非法的,但在美国是被允许的。然而,在2000年,加拿大的政策发生了变化,允许处方药进行“提醒式”广告。这是一种只提及品牌名称而不做健康声明的广告形式。对于有严重风险“黑框”警告的药品,美国禁止进行“提醒式”广告。本研究调查了1995年至2006年这12年间加拿大DTCA的支出情况,这期间涵盖了这一政策转变。我们探讨了加拿大的人均年度支出与美国相比如何,以及带有加拿大或美国监管安全警告的药品是否在提醒式广告中向加拿大公众进行宣传。

方法/主要发现:处方药广告支出数据是从市场研究公司TNS Media Inc.获取的加拿大卫生部门支出数据集中提取的。支出数据进行了通胀调整,并与美国的支出进行了比较。加拿大品牌DTCA的通胀调整后支出从1999年之前的每年不到200万加元增长到2006年的超过2200万加元。主要增长在于广播广告,2006年广播广告占支出的83%。美国的人均年度支出平均是加拿大的24倍。西乐葆(塞来昔布)在美国有黑框警告,在加拿大也受到三次安全警告,它是2005年和2006年在加拿大电视上广告投放最多的药品。在支出超过50万加元的8个品牌中,这些品牌在所有媒体的品牌DTCA中总共占59%,其中6个受到加拿大的安全警告,4个有美国的黑框警告。

结论/意义:自2000年以来,加拿大的品牌“提醒式”广告迅速增长,主要原因是电视广告的增加。尽管加拿大的DTCA人均支出远低于美国,但没有证据表明广告内容更安全或产品选择更优;加拿大许多广告投放量大的药品都受到了安全警告。对于寻求在行业扩大广告压力下达成折衷解决方案的政府来说,加拿大的经验是一个严峻的警告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1795/2682647/41922cf59056/pone.0005699.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验