Vyas Raj M, Jarrahy Reza, Sisodia Manisha, Jourabchi Natanel, Wasson Kristy L, Bradley James P
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-6960, USA.
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 May;20(3):733-6. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181a2d9aa.
Transverse maxillary hypoplasia, with or without cleft deformity, is typically treated with orthodontic expansion. However, the management of those patients who present later in life with severe uncorrected deformities or who have failed prior orthodontic care remains controversial. Tooth-borne palatal expanders have limitations in this subset of patients with scarred, constricted cleft palate. In this study, we assess the efficacy and safety of using a bone-borne palatal distraction device as an alternative treatment for this difficult subset of patients.
Older children with a constricted maxilla who previously had unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate repairs and failed orthodontic expansion were included in the study (n = 15). Patients underwent Le Fort I corticotomy with placement of the bone-borne distraction device, expansion at a rate of 0.5 mm/d, and subsequent alveolar bone grafting. Preoperative and follow-up maxillary impressions were compared with assessed improvements in intermolar distance, intercanine distance, alveolar cleft width, and total palatal area. In addition, a small group of noncleft patients with constricted maxillas was treated with bone-borne palatal distraction without a corticotomy (n = 4).
The mean amount of distraction in all patients was 14.1 mm, with a follow-up period of 19 months (range, 8-30 months). The average increase in intermolar distance was 8.4 mm, intercanine distance increased by an average of 9.5 mm, and palate surface areas were increased by a mean of 28.9 mm2. Relapse was between 4% and 7%, and all patients underwent subsequent alveolar bone grafting. In addition, the noncleft patients successfully underwent bone-borne palatal distraction without a corticotomy, with a 4% to 5% relapse.
Rapid palatal expansion using a bone-borne distraction device in cleft patients with transverse maxillary hypoplasia who have failed nonsurgical orthodontic expansion provides adequate expansion necessary for alveolar bone grafting and stable results.
上颌横向发育不全,无论有无腭裂畸形,通常采用正畸扩弓治疗。然而,对于那些成年后出现严重未矫正畸形或正畸治疗失败的患者,其治疗方法仍存在争议。牙支持式腭扩展器在这类患有瘢痕化、狭窄腭裂的患者中存在局限性。在本研究中,我们评估了使用骨支持式腭牵张装置作为这类难治性患者替代治疗方法的有效性和安全性。
本研究纳入了上颌狭窄的大龄儿童,这些儿童既往接受过单侧或双侧唇腭裂修复术且正畸扩弓治疗失败(n = 15)。患者接受Le Fort I截骨术并植入骨支持式牵张装置,以每天0.5毫米的速度进行扩弓,随后进行牙槽骨植骨。将术前和随访时的上颌印模进行比较,评估磨牙间距离、尖牙间距离、牙槽裂宽度和腭部总面积的改善情况。此外,一小部分上颌狭窄的非腭裂患者未进行截骨术,采用骨支持式腭牵张治疗(n = 4)。
所有患者的平均牵张量为14.1毫米,随访期为19个月(范围8 - 30个月)。磨牙间距离平均增加8.4毫米,尖牙间距离平均增加9.5毫米,腭部表面积平均增加28.9平方毫米。复发率在4%至7%之间,所有患者随后均接受了牙槽骨植骨。此外,非腭裂患者未进行截骨术成功接受了骨支持式腭牵张治疗,复发率为4%至5%。
对于非手术正畸扩弓治疗失败的上颌横向发育不全的腭裂患者,使用骨支持式牵张装置进行快速腭扩弓可为牙槽骨植骨提供足够的扩弓量,并获得稳定的效果。