Mazzone Noemi, Matteini Claudio, Incisivo Veronica, Belli Evaristo
Sant'Andrea Hospital, II Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Italy.
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 May;20(3):909-15. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31818432c4.
Even if the relationship between condylar position and/or temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and dentofacial deformity is controversial in literature, several patients presenting malocclusion refer to pain and TMDs as the main trouble. There are also various opinions concerning the alterations or improvements of temporomandibular joint symptoms after orthognathic surgery. In agreement with the experience of Universität Würzburg, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of splint technique to reproduce centric condyle positioning in bimaxillary osteotomy surgeries for the patients with skeletal-facial disorders and coexisting TMDs. The present study is based on a sample of patients with maxillomandibular malocclusion and coexisting TMDs who underwent bimaxillary osteotomy surgeries with splint technique. All patients underwent a protocol consisting of various steps: Pretreatment evaluation consisted of a questionnaire on subjective symptoms, clinical examinations, photographs of the occlusion, plaster casts, bite registrations, examination of the posture; instrumental examinations; panoramic, teleradiography, and cephalometric analysis; stratigraphy of TMD; and electromyography. Presurgical treatment consisted of therapy by modified Farrar splint associated with a pharmacologic therapy for the acute symptoms; orthodontic treatment associated with a global reeducation of the posture and a pompage of the masticatory muscles; and manufacturing of an occlusal splint in the most posterior asymptomatic position. Surgical treatment consisted of bimaxillary osteotomies performed after registering condyle position by a "repositioning" plate. The condyle position is guided by the intermaxillary fixation with the interposition of the occlusal splint. Surgery on maxillary is performed through Le Fort I osteotomy and fixation. Later, sagittal splint osteotomy of mandible is performed. Position of ramus and TMD complex is guided by the positioning of the plates modeled previously and fixed to maxillary and ramus in the same relationship registered with the splint. Finally, fixation of mandibular osteotomies is performed. Postsurgically patients underwent orthodontic treatment (to stabilize occlusal and articular changes) and physical therapy. After the end of treatment, stability of results was investigated with clinical, radiologic, and electromyographic valuations. The authors' experience suggests that, as in orthognathic surgery, identification of a correct condyle-fossa relationship (achieved by splint and repositioning plate) is essential to guide osteosynthesis after sagittal split osteotomy in patients affected by TMDs and ultimately affects the stability of the procedure.
尽管文献中关于髁突位置与颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)及牙颌面畸形之间的关系存在争议,但一些存在错颌畸形的患者将疼痛和TMDs视为主要问题。关于正颌外科手术后颞下颌关节症状的改变或改善也有各种观点。与维尔茨堡大学的经验一致,本研究的目的是评估在治疗骨骼面部疾病并伴有TMDs的患者进行双颌截骨手术时,夹板技术重现髁突中心定位的有效性。本研究基于一组接受双颌截骨手术并采用夹板技术的上颌下颌错颌畸形且伴有TMDs的患者样本。所有患者都接受了包含多个步骤的方案:治疗前评估包括主观症状问卷、临床检查、咬合照片、石膏模型、咬合记录、姿势检查;仪器检查;全景片、远距离X线摄影和头影测量分析;TMDs的分层摄影;以及肌电图检查。术前治疗包括使用改良Farrar夹板治疗并结合针对急性症状的药物治疗;正畸治疗并结合姿势的全面再训练和咀嚼肌的按摩;以及在最靠后的无症状位置制作咬合夹板。手术治疗包括在通过“重新定位”板记录髁突位置后进行双颌截骨。髁突位置通过颌间固定并插入咬合夹板来引导。上颌手术通过Le Fort I截骨和固定进行。随后,进行下颌矢状劈开截骨。升支和TMD复合体的位置通过先前制作并固定在上颌和升支上的板的定位来引导,其关系与夹板记录的相同。最后,进行下颌截骨的固定。术后患者接受正畸治疗(以稳定咬合和关节变化)和物理治疗。治疗结束后,通过临床、放射学和肌电图评估来研究结果的稳定性。作者的经验表明,与正颌外科手术一样,确定正确的髁突 - 关节窝关系(通过夹板和重新定位板实现)对于指导TMDs患者矢状劈开截骨术后的骨合成至关重要,最终会影响手术的稳定性。