Stiver Shirley I
Department of Neurosurgical Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, California. 94110-0899, USA.
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Jun;26(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0965.
Decompressive craniectomy is widely used to treat intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Two randomized trials are currently underway to further evaluate the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy for TBI. Complications of this procedure have major ramifications on the risk-benefit balance in decision-making during evaluation of potential surgical candidates. To further evaluate the complications of decompressive craniectomy, a review of the literature was performed following a detailed search of PubMed between 1980 and 2009. The author restricted her study to literature pertaining to decompressive craniectomy for patients with TBI. An understanding of the pathophysiological events that accompany removal of a large piece of skull bone provides a foundation for understanding many of the complications associated with decompressive craniectomy. The author determined that decompressive craniectomy is not a simple, straightforward operation without adverse effects. Rather, numerous complications may arise, and they do so in a sequential fashion at specific time points following surgical decompression. Expansion of contusions, new subdural and epidural hematomas contralateral to the decompressed hemisphere, and external cerebral herniation typify the early perioperative complications of decompressive craniectomy for TBI. Within the 1st week following decompression, CSF circulation derangements manifest commonly as subdural hygromas. Paradoxical herniation following lumbar puncture in the setting of a large skull defect is a rare, potentially fatal complication that can be prevented and treated if recognized early. During the later phases of recovery, patients may develop a new cognitive, neurological, or psychological deficit termed syndrome of the trephined. In the longer term, a persistent vegetative state is the most devastating of outcomes of decompressive craniectomy. The risk of complications following decompressive craniectomy is weighed against the life-threatening circumstances under which this surgery is performed. Ongoing trials will define whether this balance supports surgical decompression as a first-line treatment for TBI.
减压性颅骨切除术被广泛用于治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的颅内高压。目前有两项随机试验正在进行,以进一步评估减压性颅骨切除术治疗TBI的有效性。该手术的并发症对潜在手术候选者评估过程中的风险效益平衡具有重大影响。为了进一步评估减压性颅骨切除术的并发症,在对1980年至2009年间的PubMed进行详细检索后,对文献进行了综述。作者将其研究限于与TBI患者减压性颅骨切除术相关的文献。了解去除一大块颅骨时伴随的病理生理事件,为理解许多与减压性颅骨切除术相关的并发症提供了基础。作者确定,减压性颅骨切除术并非没有不良反应的简单、直接的手术。相反,可能会出现许多并发症,并且它们会在手术减压后的特定时间点依次出现。挫伤扩大、减压半球对侧的新的硬膜下和硬膜外血肿以及脑外疝是TBI减压性颅骨切除术早期围手术期并发症的典型表现。在减压后的第1周内,脑脊液循环紊乱通常表现为硬膜下积液。在存在大的颅骨缺损的情况下,腰椎穿刺后出现的反常疝是一种罕见的、可能致命的并发症,如果早期识别,可以预防和治疗。在恢复的后期阶段,患者可能会出现一种新的认知、神经或心理缺陷,称为颅骨钻孔综合征。从长远来看,持续植物状态是减压性颅骨切除术最具毁灭性的结果。减压性颅骨切除术后并发症的风险与进行该手术时危及生命的情况相权衡。正在进行的试验将确定这种平衡是否支持将手术减压作为TBI的一线治疗方法。