Suppr超能文献

矫形器治疗对肱骨外上髁炎患者握力的即时影响。

The immediate effect of orthotic management on grip strength of patients with lateral epicondylosis.

作者信息

Jafarian Fahimeh Sadat, Demneh Ebrahim Sadeghi, Tyson Sarah F

机构信息

Orthotics and Prosthetics Department, Welfare and Rehabilitaion Sciences University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Jun;39(6):484-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2988.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study using a randomized crossover design.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the immediate effect of 3 common types of orthoses (2 elbow counterforce orthoses and a wrist splint) on grip strength in individuals with lateral epicondylosis.

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylosis is a common cause of pain and upper limb dysfunction. Although the effectiveness of orthoses has been reported, comparisons of effectiveness among orthoses are limited.

METHODS AND MEASURES

Fifty-two subjects with lateral epicondylosis were recruited (20 men, 32 women; mean +/- SD age, 41 +/- 8 years). Maximum and pain-free grip strength were assessed using a digital hand grip dynamometer immediately after the application of each orthosis. The 4 testing conditions included a placebo orthosis as a control condition, an elbow strap orthosis, an elbow sleeve orthosis, and a wrist splint. Data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance for each outcome measure.

RESULTS

Pain-free grip-strength was greater when using the elbow strap or the elbow sleeve orthosis compared to when using the placebo control orthosis or the wrist splint (P<.02), but there was no difference between the elbow sleeve and strap orthoses (P>.05), nor between the wrist splint and placebo orthosis (P>.05). Maximum grip strength was less when using the wrist splint compared to when tested with the elbow sleeve or the elbow strap (P< or =.003). Use of the elbow strap, elbow sleeve, or wrist splint did not change maximum grip strength compared to the control placebo orthosis condition (P>.05). There was also no difference in maximum grip strength between the elbow strap and the elbow sleeve conditions (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of the 2 types of elbow orthoses (strap and sleeve) resulted in an immediate increase in pain-free grip strength. No differences between the 2 orthoses were found, suggesting that either can be used. A wrist splint produced no immediate change in pain-free or maximum grip-strength, indicating that it should not be used as a first-choice orthosis based on those outcome measures.

摘要

研究设计

采用随机交叉设计的对照实验室研究。

目的

确定3种常见类型的矫形器(2种肘部反作用力矫形器和1种手腕夹板)对患有外侧上髁炎的个体握力的即时影响。

背景

外侧上髁炎是疼痛和上肢功能障碍的常见原因。尽管已有关于矫形器有效性的报道,但矫形器之间有效性的比较有限。

方法与测量

招募了52名患有外侧上髁炎的受试者(20名男性,32名女性;平均年龄±标准差为41±8岁)。在佩戴每种矫形器后,立即使用数字式握力计评估最大握力和无痛握力。4种测试条件包括作为对照条件的安慰剂矫形器、肘部绑带矫形器、肘部套筒矫形器和手腕夹板。对每个结果指标使用单因素方差分析进行数据分析。

结果

与使用安慰剂对照矫形器或手腕夹板相比,使用肘部绑带或肘部套筒矫形器时无痛握力更大(P<0.02),但肘部套筒矫形器和绑带矫形器之间无差异(P>0.05),手腕夹板和安慰剂矫形器之间也无差异(P>0.05)。与使用肘部套筒或肘部绑带测试相比,使用手腕夹板时最大握力较小(P≤0.003)。与对照安慰剂矫形器条件相比,使用肘部绑带、肘部套筒或手腕夹板并未改变最大握力(P>0.05)。肘部绑带和肘部套筒条件之间的最大握力也无差异(P>0.05)。

结论

使用2种类型的肘部矫形器(绑带和套筒)可使无痛握力立即增加。未发现这2种矫形器之间存在差异,表明二者均可使用。手腕夹板在无痛或最大握力方面未产生即时变化,表明基于这些结果指标,它不应作为首选矫形器使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验