Suppr超能文献

[免疫组织化学在基底样乳腺癌预后评估中的作用]

[Roles of immunohistochemistry in prognostic assessment of basal-like breast cancer].

作者信息

Liu Hui, Fan Qin-he, Zhang Zhi-hong, Li Xiao, Yu Hui-ping, Liu Guang-zhen, Meng Fan-qing

机构信息

Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jan;38(1):23-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Basal cell-like breast cancer is one of the subtypes using molecular typing, and this subtype attracted a wide spread attention. Currently, no uniform diagnostic criteria are available. Most studies demonstrated poor outcomes, but contradictory conclusions appeared recently. The prognosis of basal cell-like breast cancer using different immunohistochemical criteria were analyzed.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-four invasive breast cancers with a follow-up information over 5 years were evaluated for ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, CK14, EGFR expression on tissue microarray immunohistochemically. Based on the results, these cases using four different diagnostic criteria were categorized, namely: Nielsen (ER-/HER2-, CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+), Kim (ER-/PR-/HER2-, CK5/6+ and/or CK14+ and/or EGFR+), Triple-negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-), and basal-CK (CK5/6+ and/or CK14+). 5-year survival information was compared between groups.

RESULTS

The prevalence of basal cell-like breast cancer by Nielsen, Kim, Triple-negative and basal-CK were 15.5% (44/284), 14.8% (42/284), 43.3% (123/284) and 21.1% (60/284) respectively; the recurrence rates were 18.2% (8/44), 21.4% (9/42), 10.6% (13/123) and 11.7% (7/60) respectively. These were higher than recurrence rates for other subtypes, but only the differences by Nielsen's and Kim's criteria were significant. Using Nielsen's and Triple-negative's criteria, basal-like tumors showed shorter 5-year disease-free survival (both P < 0. 01) and overall survival (P < 0.05 and 0.01) than luminal A subtype, using Kim's criteria, basal-like tumors showed a lower 5-year disease-free but not overall survival than luminal A subtype (P < 0.01); no significant difference was found on 5-year survival between basal-like and non-basal-like tumors when typed by basal-CK.

CONCLUSION

Basal cell-like breast cancers are more likely to show more recurrence and worse outcome, but different immunohistochemical diagnostic criteria have an influence on their prognostic analysis, so a uniform diagnostic criteria is essential for the further study of basal-like breast cancers.

摘要

目的

基底样乳腺癌是分子分型中的一种亚型,该亚型受到广泛关注。目前尚无统一的诊断标准。大多数研究表明其预后较差,但最近出现了相互矛盾的结论。分析了采用不同免疫组化标准的基底样乳腺癌的预后情况。

方法

对284例有5年以上随访信息的浸润性乳腺癌进行组织芯片免疫组化检测,评估雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)、细胞角蛋白5/6(CK5/6)、细胞角蛋白14(CK14)、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的表达情况。根据检测结果,采用四种不同的诊断标准对这些病例进行分类,即:尼尔森标准(ER-/HER2-、CK5/6+和/或EGFR+)、金标准(ER-/PR-/HER2-、CK5/6+和/或CK14+和/或EGFR+)、三阴性标准(ER-/PR-/HER2-)和基底细胞角蛋白标准(CK5/6+和/或CK14+)。比较各组的5年生存信息。

结果

根据尼尔森标准、金标准、三阴性标准和基底细胞角蛋白标准诊断的基底样乳腺癌的患病率分别为15.5%(44/284)、14.8%(42/284)、43.3%(123/284)和21.1%(60/284);复发率分别为18.2%(8/44)、21.4%(9/42)、10.6%(13/123)和11.7%(7/60)。这些复发率高于其他亚型,但仅尼尔森标准和金标准的差异具有统计学意义。采用尼尔森标准和三阴性标准时,基底样肿瘤的5年无病生存率(均P < 0.01)和总生存率(P < 0.05和0.01)均短于腔面A型亚型;采用金标准时,基底样肿瘤的5年无病生存率低于腔面A型亚型,但总生存率无差异(P < 0.01);采用基底细胞角蛋白标准分型时,基底样肿瘤与非基底样肿瘤的5年生存率无显著差异。

结论

基底样乳腺癌更易复发且预后较差,但不同的免疫组化诊断标准对其预后分析有影响,因此统一的诊断标准对于基底样乳腺癌的进一步研究至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验