Chen Shu-Yan, Xu Jin, Maestre Fernando T, Chu Cheng-Jin, Wang Gang, Xiao Sa
MOE Key Laboratory of Arid and Grassland Ecology, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People's Republic of China.
J Theor Biol. 2009 May 21;258(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.011. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
We introduce a spatially explicit model that evaluates how the trade-offs between the life strategies of two interacting plant species affect the outcome of their interaction along environmental severity gradients. In our model, we represent the landscape as a two-dimensional lattice, with environmental severity increasing from left to right. Two species with different strategies, a competitor and a stress-tolerant, interact in the lattice. We find that facilitation expands the realized niche of the competitor into harsh environments by suppressing the stress-tolerant species. Most of their coexisting range is dominated by a positive effect of one species on another, with a reciprocal negative effect from the species receiving the benefits on its benefactor ("+, -"), whereas mutualistic ("+, +") interactions are only found in the harshest part of the environmental gradient. Contrarily as assumed by models commonly used in facilitation research (e.g. dual-lattice models), our results indicate that "+, +" interactions are not dominant, and that their differences with "+, -" interactions along environmental severity gradients depend on the strategies of the interacting species. By integrating the trade-off between competitive ability and stress tolerance, our model provides a new framework to investigate the interplay of facilitative and competitive interactions along environmental gradients and their impacts on processes such as population dynamics and community organization.
我们引入了一个空间明确的模型,该模型评估了两种相互作用的植物物种在生活策略之间的权衡如何沿着环境严酷梯度影响它们相互作用的结果。在我们的模型中,我们将景观表示为一个二维晶格,环境严酷程度从左到右增加。两种具有不同策略的物种,一种竞争者和一种耐胁迫者,在晶格中相互作用。我们发现促进作用通过抑制耐胁迫物种,将竞争者的实际生态位扩展到恶劣环境中。它们共存的大部分范围由一种物种对另一种物种的正效应主导,而接受益处的物种对其受益者有反向负效应(“ +, - ”),而互利(“ +, + ”)相互作用仅在环境梯度最恶劣的部分被发现。与促进研究中常用的模型(例如双晶格模型)所假设的相反,我们的结果表明“ +, + ”相互作用并不占主导地位,并且它们在沿着环境严酷梯度与“ +, - ”相互作用的差异取决于相互作用物种的策略。通过整合竞争能力和耐胁迫能力之间的权衡,我们的模型提供了一个新的框架,以研究促进性和竞争性相互作用沿着环境梯度的相互作用及其对种群动态和群落组织等过程的影响。