Pourhoseingholi M A, Moghimi-Dehkordi Bijan, Safaee Azadeh, Hajizadeh Ebrahim, Solhpour Ali, Zali M R
Research Center for Gastroenterology & Liver Disease, Shahid Behashti University, M.C., Iran.
Indian J Med Res. 2009 Mar;129(3):262-7.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. It is rarely detected early, and the prognosis remains poor. Cox proportional hazard model is used to examine the relationship between survival and covariates. Parametric survival models such as log normal regression model can also be used for this analysis. We used log normal regression model in this study to evaluate prognostic factors in gastric cancer and compared with Cox model.
We retrospectively studied the 746 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer admitted in a referral hospital in Tehran, Iran, from February 2003 through January 2007. Age at diagnosis, sex, extent of wall penetration, histology type, tumour grade, tumour size, pathologic stage, lymph node metastasis and presence of metastasis were entered into a log normal model. Hazard rate (HR) was employed to interpret the risk of death and the results were compared with Cox regression. The AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) was employed to compare the efficiency of models.
Univariate analysis indicated that with increasing age the risk of death increased significantly in both log normal and Cox models. Patients with greater tumour size were also in higher risk of death followed by those with poorly differentiated and moderately differentiated in tumour grade and advanced pathologic stage. The presence of metastasis was significant prognostic factor only in log normal analysis. In final multivariate model, age was still a significant prognostic factor in Cox regression but it was not significant in log normal model. Presence of metastasis followed by histology type were other prognostic features found significant in log normal results. Based on AIC, log normal model performed better than Cox.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that early detection of patients in younger age and in primary stages and grade of tumour could be important to decrease the risk of death in patients with gastric cancer. Comparison between Cox and log normal models indicated that log normal regression model can be a useful statistical model to find prognostic factors instead of Cox.
胃癌是世界上最常见的癌症之一。其早期很少被发现,预后仍然很差。Cox比例风险模型用于检验生存与协变量之间的关系。参数生存模型如对数正态回归模型也可用于此分析。本研究使用对数正态回归模型评估胃癌的预后因素,并与Cox模型进行比较。
我们回顾性研究了2003年2月至2007年1月在伊朗德黑兰一家转诊医院收治的746例确诊为胃癌的患者。将诊断时的年龄、性别、壁层浸润范围、组织学类型、肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、病理分期、淋巴结转移和转移情况纳入对数正态模型。采用风险率(HR)来解释死亡风险,并将结果与Cox回归进行比较。使用赤池信息准则(AIC)来比较模型的效率。
单因素分析表明,在对数正态模型和Cox模型中,随着年龄的增加,死亡风险均显著增加。肿瘤较大的患者死亡风险也较高,其次是肿瘤分级为低分化和中分化以及病理分期较晚的患者。转移的存在仅在对数正态分析中是显著的预后因素。在最终的多变量模型中,年龄在Cox回归中仍然是显著的预后因素,但在对数正态模型中不显著。转移的存在以及组织学类型是对数正态结果中发现的其他显著预后特征。基于AIC,对数正态模型比Cox模型表现更好。
我们的结果表明,早期发现年龄较小、处于肿瘤原发阶段和分级的患者对于降低胃癌患者的死亡风险可能很重要。Cox模型和对数正态模型的比较表明,对数正态回归模型可以作为一种有用的统计模型来寻找预后因素,而非Cox模型。