Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property.
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Summer;37(2):184-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00365.x.
This paper offers an economic rationale for compulsory licensing of needed medicines in developing countries. The patent system is based on a trade-off between the "deadweight losses" caused by market power and the incentive to innovate created by increased profits from monopoly pricing during the period of the patent. However, markets for essential medicines under patent in developing countries with high income inequality are characterized by highly convex demand curves, producing large deadweight losses relative to potential profits when monopoly firms exercise profit-maximizing pricing strategies. As a result, these markets are systematically ill-suited to exclusive marketing rights, a problem which can be corrected through compulsory licensing. Open licenses that permit any qualified firm to supply the market on the same terms, such as may be available under licenses of right or essential facility legal standards, can be used to mitigate the negative effects of government-granted patents, thereby increasing overall social welfare.
本文为发展中国家对必要药品实施强制许可提供了一个经济学依据。专利制度是在市场势力造成的“无谓损失”与专利垄断定价带来的创新激励之间的权衡。然而,在高收入不平等的发展中国家,专利药品市场的需求曲线呈高度凸形,当垄断企业实行利润最大化的定价策略时,相对于潜在利润而言,无谓损失很大。因此,这些市场从系统上不适合给予独家营销权,这个问题可以通过强制许可来纠正。开放许可允许任何合格的企业在相同的条件下供应市场,例如根据权利许可或基本设施法律标准可能获得的许可,可用于减轻政府授予专利的负面影响,从而提高整体社会福利。