Pandey Sudhir Kumar, Kim Ki-Hyun
Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, 98 Goon Ja Dong, Gwang Jin Goo, Seoul 143-747, South Korea.
J Chromatogr A. 2009 Jul 10;1216(28):5436-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 May 18.
In this study, the feasibility of GC-MS was evaluated for the quantification of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in environmental samples. These included methyl ethyl ketone, isobutyl alcohol, methyl isobutyl ketone, and butyl acetate plus benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). For this purpose, the gaseous standard for these VOCs were analyzed by GC-MS with the aid of both direct injection (DI) into the GC injector and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The liquid phase standard prepared independently was tested additionally by the DI method as a reference to gaseous calibration. The detection limit (DL) values, when tested for basic quality assurance in this study, showed large differences between DI (0.002-0.007 ng) and SPME method (1.03-1.81 ng) in terms of absolute mass. The DL values, when expressed in terms of concentration (v/v), showed considerable improvement in SPME (below 0.40 nmol mol(-1)) relative to the DI method (approximately 6-15 nmol mol(-1)). The reliability of the GC-MS method was further validated through an analysis of real environmental samples collected from an industrial area.
在本研究中,评估了气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GC-MS)对环境样品中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)进行定量分析的可行性。这些挥发性有机化合物包括甲乙酮、异丁醇、甲基异丁基酮、乙酸丁酯以及苯、甲苯和二甲苯(BTX)。为此,借助直接进样(DI)到气相色谱进样器以及固相微萃取(SPME)两种方式,对这些挥发性有机化合物的气态标准品进行GC-MS分析。另外,独立制备的液相标准品通过直接进样法进行测试,作为气态校准的参考。在本研究中进行基本质量保证测试时,检测限(DL)值在绝对质量方面,直接进样法(0.002 - 0.007 ng)和固相微萃取法(1.03 - 1.81 ng)之间存在很大差异。以浓度(v/v)表示时,固相微萃取法(低于0.40 nmol mol⁻¹)相对于直接进样法(约6 - 15 nmol mol⁻¹)有显著改善。通过对从工业区采集的实际环境样品进行分析,进一步验证了GC-MS方法的可靠性。