Nault Marie-Lyne, Labelle Hubert, Aubin Carl-Eric, Sangole Archana, Balazinski Marek
Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):263-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181761950.
Selection of appropriate curve fusion levels for surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex and difficult task and, despite numerous publications, still remains a highly controversial topic.
To evaluate a fuzzy-logic-based surgical planning tool by comparing the results suggested by the software with the average outcome recommended by a panel of 5 expert spinal deformity surgeons. It is hypothesized that, given the same information, the fuzzy-logic tool will perform as favorably as the surgeons.
Proof-of-concept study evaluating the use of a fuzzy-logic-assisted surgical planning tool in AIS to select the appropriate spinal curve to be instrumented.
A cohort of 30 AIS surgical cases with a main thoracic curve was used. Each case included standard measurements recorded from preoperative standing postero-anterior and lateral, supine side bending, and 1-year postoperative standing radiographs. Five experienced spinal deformity surgeons evaluated each case independently and gave their preferred levels of instrumentation and fusion. The cases were then presented to the fuzzy-logic tool to determine whether the high thoracic and/or lumbar curves were to be instrumented. For each case, a percentage value was obtained indicating inclusion/exclusion of the respective curves in the surgical instrumentation procedure. Kappa statistics was used to compare the model output and the average decision of the surgeons.
Kappa values of 0.71 and 0.64 were obtained, respectively, for the proximal thoracic and lumbar curves models, thus suggesting a good agreement of the fusion recommendations made by the fuzzy-logic tool and the surgeons.
Given the same information, the fuzzy-logic-assisted recommendation of the curve to be instrumented compared favorably with the collective decision of the surgeons. The findings thus suggest that a fuzzy-logic approach is helpful in assisting surgeons with the preoperative selection of curve instrumentation and fusion levels in AIS.
为青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)手术选择合适的曲线融合水平是一项复杂且困难的任务,尽管有大量文献发表,但仍是一个极具争议的话题。
通过将软件建议的结果与由5名脊柱畸形外科专家组成的小组推荐的平均结果进行比较,评估一种基于模糊逻辑的手术规划工具。假设在相同信息的情况下,模糊逻辑工具的表现将与外科医生一样出色。
概念验证研究,评估在AIS中使用模糊逻辑辅助手术规划工具来选择合适的待固定脊柱曲线。
使用一组30例以胸主弯为主的AIS手术病例。每个病例包括术前站立位正位和侧位、仰卧位侧弯以及术后1年站立位X线片记录的标准测量值。5名经验丰富的脊柱畸形外科医生独立评估每个病例,并给出他们首选的固定和融合水平。然后将这些病例提交给模糊逻辑工具,以确定是否要固定胸上段和/或腰段曲线。对于每个病例,获得一个百分比值,表明相应曲线在手术固定过程中的纳入/排除情况。使用Kappa统计量来比较模型输出和外科医生的平均决策。
胸上段和腰段曲线模型的Kappa值分别为0.71和0.64,这表明模糊逻辑工具给出的融合建议与外科医生的建议具有良好的一致性。
在相同信息的情况下,模糊逻辑辅助的待固定曲线建议与外科医生的集体决策相比表现良好。因此,研究结果表明模糊逻辑方法有助于协助外科医生在术前选择AIS中曲线固定和融合水平。