Köpke Thomas, Bierer Stefan, Wülfing Christian, Tiemann Arne, Hertle Lothar, Herrmann Edwin
Department of Urology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Jun;9(6):763-71. doi: 10.1586/era.09.37.
For decades, advanced renal cancer was almost resistant to systemic therapy. Only a few patients with metastatic disease derived clinical benefit from immunotherapy after nephrectomy. Recent advances in understanding the molecular biology of advanced and metastatic renal cancer led to the development of several targeted agents that showed impressive anti-tumor efficacy and prolongation of progression-free survival. The integration of these drugs into clinical practice did not only revolutionize the management of renal cancer, but also created controversy about the necessity, patient selection for and timing of the extirpation of the primary tumor, as well as metastasectomy. Data from ongoing preclinical investigations, including basic science and translational research, are presented and carried forward into multimodal considerations to optimize clinical efficacy of concomitant surgical treatments in the era of targeted agents. In addition to these analyses, this article highlights available clinical data regarding the disputable importance of surgical treatment approaches and explores the need of multimodality treatment paradigms within interdisciplinary decision making.
几十年来,晚期肾癌几乎对全身治疗耐药。只有少数转移性疾病患者在肾切除术后从免疫治疗中获得临床益处。在理解晚期和转移性肾癌分子生物学方面的最新进展促使了几种靶向药物的研发,这些药物显示出令人印象深刻的抗肿瘤疗效并延长了无进展生存期。将这些药物纳入临床实践不仅彻底改变了肾癌的治疗方式,还引发了关于原发性肿瘤切除以及转移灶切除术的必要性、患者选择和时机的争议。文中展示了正在进行的临床前研究数据,包括基础科学和转化研究,并将其纳入多模式考量,以优化靶向药物时代联合手术治疗的临床疗效。除了这些分析,本文还强调了关于手术治疗方法争议性重要性的现有临床数据,并探讨了跨学科决策中多模式治疗模式的必要性。