Duquesnoy R J, Marrari M
Division of Transplantation Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Tissue Antigens. 2009 Aug;74(2):117-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2009.01271.x. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
Although the determination of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificity has traditionally been directed toward HLA antigens, there is now increasing attention to structurally defined HLA epitopes. An understanding of the HLA epitope repertoire is important to acceptable mismatching for sensitized patients and to a new epitope-based matching algorithm aimed to reduce antibody-mediated rejection. There are two strategies to determine the HLA epitope repertoire. Terasaki's group has used an empirical method to analyze the reactivity of single allele Luminex panels with mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and absorbed/eluted alloantibodies with a computer program based on shared residues in the amino acid sequences of reactive alleles. HLAMatchmaker is a theoretical algorithm that predicts HLA epitopes on the HLA molecular surface from stereochemical modeling of epitope-paratope interfaces of antigen-antibody complexes. Our epitope repertoire is based on so-called 'eplets' representing 3-A patches of at least one polymorphic residue on the molecular surface. A comparative analysis has shown that 81/103 Terasaki's HLA class I epitopes are equivalent to individual eplets (n = 50) or pairs of eplets (n = 31) separated far enough to serve as potential contact sites for two complementarity-determining regions of antibody. An additional 12 Terasaki's epitopes (TerEps) correspond to eplets with permissible residue combinations that do not seem to affect epitope specificity. We could not identify corresponding eplets for the remaining 10 TerEps, including 8 that might be considered xeno-epitopes defined by mouse mAbs. Conversely, HLAMatchmaker has 38 additional eplets in well-exposed surface positions that do not have equivalent TerEps, and for many of them, we have found specific antibodies. These findings strengthen the concept that eplets are essential basic units of HLA epitopes and that they provide a better understanding of HLA immunogenicity (i.e. ability to induce an antibody response) and antigenicity (i.e. reactivity with specific antibody).
尽管传统上人类白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体特异性的测定是针对HLA抗原,但现在人们越来越关注结构明确的HLA表位。了解HLA表位库对于致敏患者可接受的错配以及旨在减少抗体介导排斥反应的基于新表位的匹配算法至关重要。有两种策略来确定HLA表位库。Terasaki小组采用经验方法,通过计算机程序分析单等位基因Luminex板与小鼠单克隆抗体(mAb)的反应性以及吸收/洗脱的同种异体抗体,该程序基于反应性等位基因氨基酸序列中的共享残基。HLAMatchmaker是一种理论算法,通过对抗原-抗体复合物表位-互补位界面的立体化学建模来预测HLA分子表面的HLA表位。我们的表位库基于所谓的“表位粒”,其代表分子表面至少一个多态性残基的3-A斑块。比较分析表明,Terasaki的103个HLA I类表位中有81个等同于单个表位粒(n = 50)或相距足够远的表位粒对(n = 31),可作为抗体两个互补决定区的潜在接触位点。另外12个Terasaki表位(TerEps)对应于具有允许的残基组合的表位粒,这些组合似乎不影响表位特异性。对于其余10个TerEps,我们无法识别相应的表位粒,其中包括8个可能被认为是由小鼠mAb定义的异种表位。相反,HLAMatchmaker在暴露良好的表面位置还有38个额外的表位粒,它们没有等效的TerEps,并且对于其中许多表位粒,我们已经发现了特异性抗体。这些发现强化了表位粒是HLA表位的基本基本单位这一概念,并且它们能更好地理解HLA免疫原性(即诱导抗体反应的能力)和抗原性(即与特异性抗体的反应性)。