Karam Amer K, Chiang Jing Wang, Fung Ewina, Nossov Vladimir, Karlan Beth Y
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 9095, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.022. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Extreme drug resistance (EDR) assays have been used to identify chemotherapy regimens that are least likely to be of clinical benefit in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We sought to examine the impact of EDR assay-guided therapy on the outcome of patients with EOC in the primary and recurrent settings.
We conducted a retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, EDR assay and clinical outcome data from 377 patients with EOC who had an assay sent at the time of their primary or subsequent cytoreductive surgeries. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards method to identify and estimate the impact of independent prognostic factors on time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (RS).
Increasing age was associated with a worse OS and RS (HR=1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.58 and HR=1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31, respectively for each decade increase in age). Surgical outcome in the setting of primary or secondary cytoreduction remained an important predictor of survival. Compared with patients with microscopic residual disease, patients who were left with 0.1 to 1.0 cm and >1.0 cm residual disease had an increased risk of recurrence (HR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.84 and HR=3.61; 95% CI; 2.07 to 6.39, respectively) and death (HR=1.59; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.45; and HR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.20, respectively). For patients who recurred, those who did not undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery and patients who were left with >1.0 cm residual had an increased risk of death compared to patients with microscopic residual (HR=2.13; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.54; and HR=2.84; 95% CI, 1.71 to 4.71, respectively). EDR assay results analyzed for single agents or combinations of chemotherapies failed to independently predict patient outcomes no matter if the assay was performed at the time of the primary surgery or recurrence.
EDR assay results do not independently predict or alter the outcomes of patients with EOC who are treated with the current standards of primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum and taxane combination chemotherapy.
超耐药(EDR)检测已被用于确定上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)治疗中临床获益可能性最小的化疗方案。我们试图研究EDR检测指导下的治疗对EOC患者在初始及复发情况下预后的影响。
我们对377例EOC患者的人口统计学、病理、EDR检测及临床结局数据进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在初次或后续减瘤手术时进行了检测。采用Cox比例风险法进行多因素分析,以确定并评估独立预后因素对疾病进展时间(TTP)、总生存期(OS)及复发后生存期(RS)的影响。
年龄增加与较差的OS及RS相关(年龄每增加十岁,HR分别为1.34;95%CI,1.14 - 1.58及HR = 1.14;95%CI,1.00 - 1.31)。初次或二次减瘤手术的结果仍然是生存的重要预测因素。与微小残留病患者相比,残留病为0.1至1.0 cm及>1.0 cm的患者复发风险增加(HR分别为1.94;95%CI,1.33至2.84及HR = 3.61;95%CI;2.07至6.39),死亡风险增加(HR分别为1.59;95%CI,1.03至2.45;及HR = 2.14;95%CI,1.09至4.20)。对于复发患者,未接受二次减瘤手术及残留病>1.0 cm的患者与微小残留病患者相比死亡风险增加(HR分别为2.13;95%CI,1.28至3.54;及HR = 2.84;95%CI,1.71至4.71)。无论检测是在初次手术时还是复发时进行,对单一化疗药物或化疗药物组合进行的EDR检测结果均不能独立预测患者结局。
EDR检测结果不能独立预测或改变接受初次减瘤手术及铂类和紫杉烷联合化疗当前标准治疗的EOC患者的结局。