Suppr超能文献

无髂嵴骨移植或横突融合的腰椎融合术后患者满意度及影像学结果

Patient satisfaction and radiographic outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion without iliac crest bone graft or transverse process fusion.

作者信息

Acosta Frank L, Cloyd Jordan M, Aryan Henry E, Ames Christopher P

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M779, Box 0112, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Sep;16(9):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jun 4.

Abstract

Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold standard for promoting bony fusion of the spine. However, harvest-site infection and pain are two of the most significant drawbacks of using iliac crest autograft in spinal fusion procedures. The rationale for its continued use, despite these drawbacks, has been based on the relatively higher rate of fusion reported in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether modern allograft and fusion-promoting materials combined with local bone graft results in acceptable fusion rates and patient satisfaction. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and radiographic records of 200 consecutive patients with symptomatic degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine who underwent non-revision fusion using local bone graft combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 with or without allograft. Rates of radiographic fusion and patient satisfaction were analyzed at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months, and every year thereafter. Mean follow-up was 32 months. Fusion was performed across an average of 2.5 levels and the overall fusion rate was 97%. In patients undergoing posterior fixation only there was a 5% incidence of pseudarthrosis, while the incidence was only 0.5% for patients undergoing circumferential fixation. Overall patient satisfaction at discharge was good to excellent in over 90% of patients and did not significantly change at the 6 month, 12 month and 24 month follow-up. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in rates of spinal fusion using laminectomy bone autograft combined with rhBMP-2 with or without allograft, compared to historical controls using ICBG. Fusion rates may be further improved with the use of circumferential fixation. Patient satisfaction remained high and might be because the morbidity associated with harvesting ICBG was avoided, as was the additional muscle dissection required for the fusion of lateral transverse processes.

摘要

髂嵴骨移植(ICBG)仍然是促进脊柱骨融合的金标准。然而,取骨部位感染和疼痛是脊柱融合手术中使用髂嵴自体骨移植的两个最显著缺点。尽管存在这些缺点,但仍继续使用它的理由是基于文献报道的相对较高的融合率。因此,本研究的目的是确定现代同种异体骨和促进融合的材料与局部骨移植相结合是否能产生可接受的融合率和患者满意度。我们回顾性分析了200例连续的有症状的腰椎退行性疾病患者的临床、手术和影像学记录,这些患者接受了使用局部骨移植联合重组人骨形态发生蛋白(rhBMP)-2(有或无同种异体骨)的非翻修融合手术。在出院时、6个月、12个月以及此后每年分析影像学融合率和患者满意度。平均随访时间为32个月。平均融合节段为2.5个,总体融合率为97%。仅接受后路固定的患者假关节发生率为5%,而接受环形固定的患者假关节发生率仅为0.5%。超过90%的患者出院时总体患者满意度为良好至优秀,在6个月、12个月和24个月随访时无显著变化。总之,与使用ICBG的历史对照相比,使用椎板切除术自体骨联合rhBMP-2(有或无同种异体骨)进行脊柱融合的融合率没有显著差异。使用环形固定可能会进一步提高融合率。患者满意度仍然很高,这可能是因为避免了与采集ICBG相关的发病率,以及融合外侧横突所需的额外肌肉剥离。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验