Suppr超能文献

淋巴结病细针穿刺细胞学检查的可靠性及局限性:1261例分析

Reliability and limitations of fine needle aspiration cytology of lymphadenopathies. An analysis of 1,261 cases.

作者信息

Gupta A K, Nayar M, Chandra M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1991 Nov-Dec;35(6):777-83.

PMID:1950334
Abstract

In a study spanning over two years, 1,261 cases with clinically significant lymphadenopathies were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to evaluate the reliability and limitations of the procedure. In the first phase of the study, consisting of 100 cases, the cytologic diagnosis was compared with histopathology, and the results were analyzed with a view to standardizing the procedure. In the second phase of the study, consisting of 1,161 patients, FNAC was used as the primary modality of diagnosis. Excision biopsy was done only when there was a clinical-cytologic discrepancy, failure to respond to treatment or FNAC diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The highest diagnostic accuracy with FNAC was observed in metastatic carcinoma. Though tuberculous lymphadenitis, reactive hyperplasia and lymphoma were diagnosed with almost similar accuracy, reactive hyperplasia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma proved difficult to diagnose. Although FNAC has proven to be a simple, safe, reliable and cost-effective diagnostic tool for lymphadenopathies, the limitations of the procedure should be kept in mind and excision biopsy used whenever required.

摘要

在一项为期两年多的研究中,对1261例具有临床意义的淋巴结病患者进行了细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC),以评估该检查方法的可靠性和局限性。在研究的第一阶段,有100例患者,将细胞学诊断与组织病理学进行比较,并对结果进行分析,以期规范该检查方法。在研究的第二阶段,有1161例患者,FNAC被用作主要诊断方法。仅在出现临床-细胞学差异、对治疗无反应或FNAC诊断为非霍奇金淋巴瘤时才进行切除活检。FNAC对转移性癌的诊断准确性最高。虽然结核性淋巴结炎、反应性增生和淋巴瘤的诊断准确性几乎相似,但反应性增生和非霍奇金淋巴瘤的诊断较为困难。尽管FNAC已被证明是一种用于淋巴结病的简单、安全、可靠且具有成本效益的诊断工具,但应牢记该检查方法的局限性,并在需要时使用切除活检。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验