Suppr超能文献

低剂量与高剂量阿扑吗啡治疗诱导的对多巴胺能抑制和刺激作用的行为敏化:一种非常规剂量和反应逆转敏化挑战试验揭示了敏化机制。

Behavioral sensitization to dopaminergic inhibitory and stimulatory effects induced by low vs. high dose apomorphine treatments: an unconventional dose and response reversal sensitization challenge test reveals sensitization mechanisms.

作者信息

Braga Príscila Quintanilha, Dias Flávia Regina Cruz, Carey Robert J, Carrera Marinete Pinheiro

机构信息

Behavioral Pharmacology Group, Laboratory of Animal Health, State University of North Fluminense, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000, Parque California, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-600, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 1;204(1):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

Abstract

Low dose apomorphine treatments preferentially activate dopamine autoreceptors and inhibit dopamine neurons as well as behavior. In contrast, high doses of apomorphine induce locomotor stimulation by activating dopamine postsynaptic receptors. We compared the effects of low (0.05 mg/kg) vs. high (2.0 mg/kg) repeated apomorphine treatments (5) using paired/unpaired protocols upon the development of Pavlovian conditioned drug responses and upon drug sensitization effects. In addition to the conventional challenge test for sensitization, we also conducted a treatment reversal sensitization test in which low dose groups received the high dose treatment and vice versa. The high dose treatment produced the expected Pavlovian conditioned locomotor stimulant response as well as a sensitization effect in the high dose challenge test; but in the low dose challenge test, the effect was desensitization. The low dose apomorphine regimen induced an inhibitory sensitization effect in the low dose challenge test. In the high dose reversal challenge test, there was a sensitization effect to the locomotor stimulant effect. The low dose apomorphine treatments, however, did not produce a Pavlovian conditioned locomotor inhibitory effect. Surprisingly, the dose reversal challenge test revealed context-independent as well as context-specific sensitization/desensitization effects. These findings demonstrate that Pavlovian drug conditioned effects and drug sensitization effects are independent phenomena and that sensitization effects are not response specific. Moreover, context-specific vs. context-independent sensitization effects were protocol dependent but not drug dose dependent.

摘要

低剂量阿扑吗啡治疗优先激活多巴胺自身受体并抑制多巴胺神经元及行为。相比之下,高剂量阿扑吗啡通过激活多巴胺突触后受体诱导运动兴奋。我们使用配对/非配对方案比较了低剂量(0.05毫克/千克)与高剂量(2.0毫克/千克)重复阿扑吗啡治疗(5次)对巴甫洛夫条件性药物反应发展及药物敏化作用的影响。除了常规的敏化激发试验外,我们还进行了治疗逆转敏化试验,其中低剂量组接受高剂量治疗,反之亦然。高剂量治疗在高剂量激发试验中产生了预期的巴甫洛夫条件性运动兴奋反应以及敏化作用;但在低剂量激发试验中,作用是脱敏。低剂量阿扑吗啡方案在低剂量激发试验中诱导了抑制性敏化作用。在高剂量逆转激发试验中,对运动兴奋作用有敏化作用。然而,低剂量阿扑吗啡治疗未产生巴甫洛夫条件性运动抑制作用。令人惊讶的是,剂量逆转激发试验揭示了与背景无关以及与背景相关的敏化/脱敏作用。这些发现表明,巴甫洛夫药物条件性作用和药物敏化作用是独立的现象,且敏化作用并非反应特异性的。此外,与背景相关的敏化作用与与背景无关的敏化作用取决于实验方案而非药物剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验