Dearworth James R, Brenner J E, Blaum J F, Littlefield T E, Fink D A, Romano J M, Jones M S
Department of Biology and Neuroscience Program, Lafayette College, Easton, Pennsylvania 18042-1778, USA.
Vis Neurosci. 2009 May-Jun;26(3):309-18. doi: 10.1017/S0952523809090099. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
The pond turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) exhibits a notably sluggish pupillary light reflex (PLR), with pupil constriction developing over several minutes following light onset. In the present study, we examined the dynamics of the efferent branch of the reflex in vitro using preparations consisting of either the isolated head or the enucleated eye. Stimulation of the oculomotor nerve (nIII) using 100-Hz current trains resulted in a maximal pupil constriction of 17.4% compared to 27.1% observed in the intact animal in response to light. When current amplitude was systematically increased from 1 to 400 microA, mean response latency decreased from 64 to 45 ms, but this change was not statistically significant. Hill equations fitted to these responses indicated a current threshold of 3.8 microA. Stimulation using single pulses evoked a smaller constriction (3.8%) with response latencies and threshold similar to that obtained using train stimulation. The response evoked by postganglionic stimulation of the ciliary nerve using 100-Hz trains was largely indistinguishable from that of train stimulation of nIII. However, application of single-pulse stimulation postganglionically resulted in smaller pupil constriction at all current levels relative to that of nIII stimulation, suggesting that there is amplification of efferent drive at the ganglion. Time constants for constrictions ranged from 88 to 154 ms with relaxations occurring more slowly at 174-361 ms. These values for timing from in vitro are much faster than the time constant 1.66 min obtained for the light response in the intact animal. The rapid dynamics of pupil constriction observed here suggest that the slow PLR of the turtle observed in vivo is not due to limitations of the efferent pathway. Rather, the sluggish response probably results from photoreceptive mechanisms or central processing.
水龟(滑龟指名亚种)表现出明显迟缓的瞳孔对光反射(PLR),光照开始后瞳孔收缩会在几分钟内逐渐形成。在本研究中,我们使用分离的头部或去核眼睛制成的标本,在体外研究了该反射传出支的动力学。使用100赫兹的串刺激动眼神经(nIII),导致瞳孔最大收缩为17.4%,而完整动物对光反应时观察到的最大收缩为27.1%。当电流幅度从1微安系统地增加到400微安时,平均反应潜伏期从64毫秒降至45毫秒,但这种变化无统计学意义。拟合这些反应的希尔方程表明电流阈值为3.8微安。使用单脉冲刺激引起的收缩较小(3.8%),其反应潜伏期和阈值与串刺激时相似。使用100赫兹串刺激睫状神经节后引起的反应与刺激动眼神经nIII的反应基本无法区分。然而,节后施加单脉冲刺激在所有电流水平下导致的瞳孔收缩均小于动眼神经nIII刺激时的收缩,这表明神经节处传出驱动存在放大效应。收缩时间常数范围为88至154毫秒,舒张发生得更慢,为174至361毫秒。体外获得的这些时间值比完整动物光反应的时间常数1.66分钟快得多。此处观察到的瞳孔快速收缩动力学表明,在体内观察到的龟的迟缓瞳孔对光反射并非由于传出通路的限制。相反,迟缓反应可能是由光感受机制或中枢处理导致的。