Simon P M, Skatrud J B, Badr M S, Griffin D M, Iber C, Dempsey J A
Medical Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1033-41. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1033.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a neuromechanical inhibitory effect on respiratory muscle activity during mechanical ventilation and to determine whether upper and lower airway receptors provide this inhibitory feedback. Several protocols were completed during mechanical ventilation: (1) positive and negative pressure changes in the upper airway, (2) airway anesthesia to examine the consequences of receptor blockade on respiratory muscle activity, (3) increasing FRC with positive end-expiratory pressure to study the effect of hyperinflation or stretch on respiratory muscle activity, and (4) use of heart-lung transplant patients to determine the effects of vagal denervation on respiratory muscle activity. All subjects were mechanically hyperventilated with positive pressure until inspiratory muscle activity was undetectable and the end-tidal PCO2 decreased to less than 30 mm Hg. End-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) was increased by either adding CO2 to the inspired gas or decreasing tidal volume (50 ml/min). The PETCO2 where a change in inspiratory muscle activity occurred was taken as the recruitment threshold (PCO2RT). Neuromechanical feedback caused significant inspiratory muscle inhibition during mechanical ventilation, as evidenced by the difference between PCO2RT and PETCO2 during spontaneous eupnea (45 +/- 4 versus 39 +/- 4 mm Hg) and a lower PCO2RT when tidal volume was reduced with a constant frequency and fraction of inspired CO2. Recruitment threshold was unchanged during positive and negative pressure ventilation, during upper and lower airway anesthesia, and in vagally denervated lung transplant patients. These findings demonstrate that neuromechanical feedback causes highly significant inhibition of inspiratory muscle activity during mechanical ventilation; upper and lower airway receptors do not appear to mediate this effect.
本研究的目的是证明机械通气期间对呼吸肌活动存在神经机械性抑制作用,并确定上、下气道受体是否提供这种抑制性反馈。在机械通气期间完成了多项方案:(1)上气道的正压和负压变化;(2)气道麻醉以检查受体阻断对呼吸肌活动的影响;(3)使用呼气末正压增加功能残气量,以研究肺过度充气或牵张对呼吸肌活动的影响;(4)利用心肺移植患者确定迷走神经切断对呼吸肌活动的影响。所有受试者均接受正压机械性过度通气,直至吸气肌活动无法检测到且呼气末PCO2降至低于30 mmHg。通过向吸入气体中添加CO2或减少潮气量(50 ml/min)来增加呼气末PCO2(PETCO2)。将吸气肌活动发生变化时的PETCO2作为募集阈值(PCO2RT)。神经机械性反馈在机械通气期间引起显著的吸气肌抑制,这在自主呼吸平稳期PCO2RT与PETCO2之间的差异(45±4对39±4 mmHg)以及在恒定频率和吸入CO2比例下减少潮气量时较低的PCO2RT中得到证明。在正压和负压通气期间、上、下气道麻醉期间以及迷走神经切断的肺移植患者中,募集阈值均未改变。这些发现表明,神经机械性反馈在机械通气期间引起对吸气肌活动的高度显著抑制;上、下气道受体似乎并未介导这种作用。