Banta David, Oortwijn Wija J
University of Maastricht.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:143-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090564. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
The aim of this report was to describe the history of health technology assessment (HTA) in The Netherlands.
This article is a descriptive review from two people who have been very much involved in the events described and is based on review of relevant policy documents and Web sites.
HTA has been progressively developed in The Netherlands since (at least) the early 1980s. Beginning in 1985, there were progressive attempts to expand and institutionalized HTA in The Netherlands healthcare system. These attempts were generally successful, but did not result in a national agency for HTA. An important development in HTA in The Netherlands was a special fund (Ontwikkelingsgeneeskunde) designed to support prospective HTAs with the main purpose of affecting insurance coverage decisions. The administration of this fund moved progressively to broaden the subjects chosen for analysis to include such subjects as chronic illness and disability. A more-or-less hidden conflict developed in the question of the leadership and orientation of this fund, with the result that it was largely moved to a more research-oriented and less policy-oriented site.
The situation today is that HTA is visible and is used by the government in policy decisions, especially in the areas of prevention and screening. In addition, HTA is influential in insurance coverage decision making, especially in the field of pharmaceuticals. The principles of HTA and evidence-based medicine are generally familiar to physicians and other clinicians, however, the influence of HTA on clinical and administrative decisions is less than in some other countries.
本报告旨在描述荷兰卫生技术评估(HTA)的历史。
本文是两位深度参与所述事件的人员所做的描述性综述,基于对相关政策文件和网站的回顾。
自(至少)20世纪80年代初以来,荷兰的HTA一直在逐步发展。从1985年开始,荷兰医疗保健系统中不断尝试扩大HTA并使其制度化。这些尝试总体上是成功的,但并未产生一个全国性的HTA机构。荷兰HTA的一个重要发展是设立了一个特别基金(发展医学),旨在支持前瞻性HTA,其主要目的是影响保险覆盖范围的决策。该基金的管理逐渐扩大了所选分析主题的范围,将慢性病和残疾等主题纳入其中。在该基金的领导和方向问题上出现了或多或少的隐性冲突,结果是该基金在很大程度上转移到了一个更注重研究而非政策的机构。
如今的情况是,HTA已广为人知,并被政府用于政策决策,尤其是在预防和筛查领域。此外,HTA在保险覆盖范围决策中具有影响力,尤其是在制药领域。HTA和循证医学的原则在医生和其他临床医生中普遍为人所知,然而,HTA对临床和行政决策的影响小于其他一些国家。