Chi Alexander, Gao Mingcheng, Sinacore James, Nguyen Nam P, Vali Faisal, Albuquerque Kevin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.041. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
To compare the dose distribution between customized planning (CP) and adopting a single plan (SP) in multifractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy and to establish predictors for the necessity of CP in a given patient.
A total of 50 computed tomography-based plans for 10 patients were evaluated. Each patient had received 6 Gy for five fractions. The clinical target volume and organs at risk (i.e., rectum, bladder, sigmoid, and small bowel) were delineated on each computed tomography scan. For the SP approach, the same dwell position and time was used for all fractions. For the CP approach, the dwell position and time were reoptimized for each fraction. Applicator position variation was determined by measuring the distance between the posterior bladder wall and the tandem at the level of the vaginal fornices.
The organs at risk D(2cc) (dose to 2 cc volume) was increased with the SP approach. The dose variation was statistically similar between the tandem and ring and tandem and ovoid groups. The bladder D(2cc) dose was 81.95-105.42 Gy(2) for CP and 82.11-122.49 Gy(2) for SP. In 5 of the 10 patients, the bladder would have been significantly overdosed with the SP approach. The variation of the posterior bladder wall distance from that in the first fraction was correlated with the increase in the bladder D(2cc) (SP/CP), with a correlation coefficient of -0.59.
Our results support the use of CP instead of the SP approach to help avoid a significant overdose to the bladder. This is especially true for a decrease in the posterior wall distance of >/=0.5 cm compared with that in the first fraction.
比较多分割高剂量率近距离放射治疗中定制计划(CP)和采用单一计划(SP)之间的剂量分布,并确定特定患者中CP必要性的预测因素。
对10例患者的50个基于计算机断层扫描的计划进行了评估。每位患者接受5次分割,每次6 Gy。在每次计算机断层扫描上勾画临床靶区和危及器官(即直肠、膀胱、乙状结肠和小肠)。对于SP方法,所有分割使用相同的驻留位置和时间。对于CP方法,每个分割的驻留位置和时间重新优化。通过测量阴道穹窿水平膀胱后壁与施源器之间的距离来确定施源器位置变化。
采用SP方法时,危及器官的D(2cc)(2 cc体积的剂量)增加。施源器和环形施源器组与施源器和卵圆形施源器组之间的剂量变化在统计学上相似。CP组膀胱D(2cc)剂量为81.95 - 105.42 Gy² / 次,SP组为82.11 - 122.49 Gy² / 次。10例患者中有5例,采用SP方法时膀胱会出现明显的剂量过量。膀胱后壁距离与首次分割相比的变化与膀胱D(2cc)(SP/CP)的增加相关,相关系数为 -0.59。
我们的结果支持使用CP而非SP方法,以帮助避免膀胱出现明显的剂量过量。与首次分割相比,后壁距离减少≥0.5 cm时尤其如此。