Center of Neuropharmacology, Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Dec;34 Suppl 1:S208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.05.014.
Although stress represents the major environmental element of susceptibility for mood disorders, the relationship between stress and disease remains to be fully established. In the present article we review the evidence in support for a role of neuronal plasticity, and in particular of neurotrophic factors. Even though decreased levels of norepinephrine and serotonin may underlie depressive symptoms, compelling evidence now suggests that mood disorders are characterized by reduced neuronal plasticity, which can be brought about by exposure to stress at different stages of life. Indeed the expression of neurotrophic molecules, such as the neurotrophin BDNF, is reduced in depressed subjects as well as in experimental animals exposed to adverse experience at early stages of life or at adulthood. These changes show an anatomical specificity and might be sustained by epigenetic mechanisms. Pharmacological intervention may normalize such defects and improve neuronal function through the modulation of the same factors that are defective in depression. Several studies have demonstrated that chronic, but not acute, antidepressant treatment increases the expression of BDNF and may enhance its localization at synaptic level. Antidepressant treatment can normalize deficits in neurotrophin expression produced by chronic stress paradigms, but may also alter the modulation of BDNF under acute stressful conditions. In summary, there is good agreement in considering neuronal plasticity, and the expression of key proteins such as the neurotrophin BDNF, as a central player for the effects of stress on brain function and its implication for psychopathology. Accordingly, effective treatments should not limit their effects to the control of neurotransmitter and hormonal dysfunctions, but should be able to normalize defective mechanisms that sustain the impairment of neuronal plasticity.
尽管压力是易患情绪障碍的主要环境因素,但压力与疾病之间的关系仍有待充分确立。在本文中,我们回顾了支持神经元可塑性,特别是神经营养因子作用的证据。尽管去甲肾上腺素和 5-羟色胺水平降低可能是抑郁症状的基础,但现在有强有力的证据表明,情绪障碍的特征是神经元可塑性降低,这种降低可能是由于在生命的不同阶段暴露于应激而引起的。事实上,神经营养分子(如神经营养因子 BDNF)的表达在抑郁患者以及在生命早期或成年期经历不良经历的实验动物中减少。这些变化表现出解剖学特异性,并且可能由表观遗传机制维持。药物干预可以通过调节在抑郁中存在缺陷的相同因子来使这些缺陷正常化并改善神经元功能。几项研究表明,慢性而非急性抗抑郁治疗可增加 BDNF 的表达,并可能增强其在突触水平的定位。抗抑郁治疗可以使慢性应激模型引起的神经营养因子表达缺陷正常化,但也可能改变急性应激条件下 BDNF 的调节。总之,人们普遍认为神经元可塑性以及关键蛋白(如神经营养因子 BDNF)的表达是应激对大脑功能及其对精神病理学影响的核心因素。因此,有效的治疗方法不应将其作用仅限于控制神经递质和激素功能障碍,而应能够使维持神经元可塑性受损的缺陷机制正常化。